摘要
目的:比较针刺素髎为主及口服去痛片治疗原发性痛经的疗效差异。方法:将60例患者随机分成针刺组与西药组,每组30例。针刺组采用针刺治疗,取穴以素髎穴为主,西药组采用口服去痛片治疗。结果:针刺组总有效率为100.0%(30/30),西药组总有效率为93.3%(28/30),两组疗效相当(P>0.05)。针刺组20 min内起效25例,西药组20 min内起效4例,针刺组优于西药组(P<0.05)。结论:针刺素髎为主与口服去痛片疗效无明显差异,但针刺组起效时间明显短于西药组。
Objective To compare the difference of therapeutic effect for needling mainly at Saliao （素髎 GV 25） and oral administration of anodyne on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. Methods Sixty patients were randomly divided into an acupuncture group and a medication group, each group with 30 patients. Sulliao （素髎 GV 25） was taken as main point in acupuncture group, anodyne was applied orally in medication group. Results The total effective rate in acupuncture group was 100.0% （30/30）, which was equivalent to 93.3% （28/30） in medication group （P〉0.05）. However in acupuncture group 25 patients with pain relieved within 20 min, while in medication group only 4 patients with pain relieved within 20min, therefore acupuncture group was superior to medication group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion There was no distinct difference between the therapeutic effect in acupuncture group and medication group except the initial time which showing effects in acupuncture group is much shorter than medication group.
关键词
痛经穴
素髎
针灸疗法
Dysmenorrhea
Point GV 25 （Saliao）
Acup-Mox Therapy
