期刊文献+

院前急救与急诊介入一体化治疗急性脑梗死的临床研究 被引量:10

Clinical study of integration therapy of pre-hospital care and emergency intervention for acute cerebral infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察院前急救与急诊脑动脉内溶栓一体化治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效,探讨急性脑梗死临床治疗的新模式。方法:采用院前急救与急诊脑动脉内溶栓一体化的治疗模式治疗57例急性脑梗死患者,观察脑血管再通率和患者生存率,采取欧洲卒中量表(ESS)及,Barthel指数(BI),评价患者神经功能的恢复情况。结果:在超早期时间窗内接受溶栓治疗率达91.2%,在3h、6h、12h内接受溶栓治疗的再通率分别为:96.7%、85.7%、60.0%;病死率分别是:0%、4.76%、20.00%;致残率及接近治愈-完全恢复率:0%、9.5%、20.0%;近完全恢复率为:96.8%、85.7%、60.0%。结论:院前急救与急诊脑动脉内溶栓一体化的治疗模式显著缩短了治疗流程,提高了脑血管再通率和神经功能恢复率,值得在临床推广应用。 Objective:To investigate the efficacy and feasibility of integration therapy of pre-hospital care and emergency intervention for acute cerebral infarction treatment.Method:Fifty-seven patients were treated by integration therapy model of emergency intervention and pre-hospital care.Europe stroke scales(ESS) and Barthel Index(BI) were used to evaluate the recovery of neurological function.Result:91.2% patients received thrombolytic therapy within the ultra early time window.The complete recanalization rate was 96.7%,85.7% and 60.0% within 3 hours,6 hours,and 12 hours each by the treated model.The mortality rate was 0%、4.76%、20.00% each and the disability rate was 0%、9.5%、20.0%.The nearly complete recovery rate were 96.8%,85.7%,60.0%.Conclusion:The integration therapy model of pre-hospital care and emergency intervention could shorten the treatment process and improve the rate of vascular recanalization and neurologic recovery.This therapy model is worth of clinical application.
出处 《临床急诊杂志》 CAS 2011年第3期155-157,共3页 Journal of Clinical Emergency
关键词 急性脑梗死 院前急救 介入动脉内溶栓 一体化治疗 acute cerebral infarction pre-hospital care emergency intervention thrombolytic by artery integration thrapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1TREIB J, GRAUER M T, WOESSNER R, et al. Treatment of stroke on an intensive stroke unit;a no- vel Concept[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2000,26 : 1598- 1611.
  • 2棚橋紀夫,徐万鹏.脑梗塞治疗指南[J].日本医学介绍,2006,27(10):456-459. 被引量:32
  • 3HACKE W,BLUHMKI E,STEINER T,et al. Dichot- omized efficacy endpoints and global end-point analy- sis applied to the ECASS in tention-to-treat data set posthoc analysis of ECASS I [ J ]. Stroke, 1998, 29 : 2037-2075.
  • 4HOSSMANN K A. Viability thresholds and the pe- numbra of forcal ischemia[J]. Ann Neurbl, 1994,36 .. 553--554.
  • 5ASTRUP J. Thresholds incerebbrat ischemic:The is- chemic penumbra[J]. Stroke, 1981,12 : 723 -- 725.
  • 6SMITH W S. Pathophysiology of focal cerebral ische- mia:a therapeutic perspective[J]. J Vasc Interv Radi- o1,2004,15:3-12.
  • 7何龙泉,白莉莉,陈伟.以循证医学理念浅析急性缺血性脑卒中治疗[J].东南国防医药,2004,6(2):152-154. 被引量:2
  • 8ASSUNTA DE LUCA, DANILO TONI, LAURA LAURIA1, et al. An emergency clinical pathway for stroke patients-results of acluster randomized trial (is- rctn41456865) [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 2009,9:14-14.
  • 9MARICA FERRI, ASSUNTA DE LUCA, PAOLO GIORGI ROSSI. Does a pre-hospital emergency path- way improve early diagnosis and referral in suspected stroke patients? Study protocol of acluster random- ised trial[-ISRCTN41456865] [J]. BMC Health Serv- ices Research, 2005,5 : 66- 66.

二级参考文献25

  • 1CAST(Chinese Acute Stroke Trial) Collaboration Group.CAST:randomized placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20 000 patients with acute ischemic stroke,1997.
  • 2Sacco RL;Elkind MS.Update on antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention[J],2000.
  • 3Kidwell CS;Liebeskind DS;Starkman S.Trends in acute ischemic stroke trials through the 20th century[J],2001.
  • 4王拥军.第二十七届国际卒中会议纪要,2002.
  • 5韩葳.尼莫地平临床应用专家研讨会,2002.
  • 6Minematsu K.EBM in stroke,2002.
  • 7北京神经病学学术沙龙.BNC 脑血管病临床指南,2002.
  • 8Holloway RG;Benesch C;Rush SR.Stroke prevention:narrowing the evidence-practice gap,2000(10).
  • 9Sinha S;Warburton EA.The evolution of stroke units-towards a more intensive approach[J],2000.
  • 10Duffy BK;Phillips PA;Davis SM.Evidence-based care and outcomes of acute stroke managed in hospital specialty units[J],2003(07).

共引文献32

同被引文献77

引证文献10

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部