期刊文献+

共时性与历时性:中国传统史学与西方近代史学的分途 被引量:3

Synchronism and Diachronism :the Different Emphasis of Chinese Traditional History and Western Modern History
下载PDF
导出
摘要 求真与否不是中国传统史学与西方近代史学的分途,而是共途。西方近代史学的典型特征是强调历时性,核心内容在于探寻历史规律。中国传统史学的典型特征是强调共时性,核心思想在于阐明治乱之道,即以儒家学说为主体的价值体系。20世纪以降,中国史学革命愈发重视规律,西方史学的自我反思却愈发轻视规律。历史过程不能脱离时空成为抽象的存在,历史认识同样不能脱离共时性与历时性而抽象存在。将中西史学的共时性与历时性特征有机结合,或许有益于史学的未来发展。 Both Chinese Traditional History and Western Modern History had paid much attention to the reality of history,which is their common base.The Different Emphasis are Synchronism and Diachronism.On one side,a typical feature of Chinese Traditional History is its Synchronism,that is trying to find Daoism of nation.On the other side,a typical feature of western Traditional History is its Synchronism,that is trying to find law of history.From the 20th century on,both are changing and moving to its opposite side.Maybe they can help each other,and will be helpful to history in the future.
作者 张文涛
出处 《北方论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期91-95,共5页 The Northern Forum
关键词 共时性 历时性 中西史学 Synchronism Diachronism Chinese Traditional History Western Modern History
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1杜维运.中国史学史[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010.
  • 2[美]伊格尔斯.德国的历史观[M].彭刚,顾杭译.上海:译林出版社,2006.
  • 3[美]海斯,穆恩,韦兰.世界史[M].中民院研究室,译.北京:三联书店,1975:646.
  • 4依格尔斯,王晴佳.中西史学思想之比较——以西方历史哲学与儒学为中心[J].学术研究,2004(5):75-80. 被引量:5
  • 5[法]孔多塞.人类精神进步史纲要[M].何兆武,何冰译.北京:三联书店,1998.
  • 6[德]黑格尔.历史哲学[M].王造时译.上海:上海书店出版社,1999.
  • 7A. W. Ward LitL , Cambridge Modern History , New York: The Macmillan Company. 1903.
  • 8杨伯峻.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,2000..
  • 9姚松 朱恒夫.史通全译[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1997..
  • 10叶英.文史通义校注[M].北京:中华书局,2000.

二级参考文献15

  • 1彼得·伯克(PeterBurke),王晴佳译.西方历史思想的十大特点[J].史学理论研究,1997(1):69-77. 被引量:19
  • 2Benjamin A Elman, From philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China (Cambridge MA, 1984) .
  • 3Peter Burke, " Western Historical Thought in World Perspective: Some Theses for Debate",德文版收在J rn R sen, ed. Westliches Geschichtsdenken. Eine interkulturelle Debatte (Gttingen, 1999), pp. 31-52.
  • 4Charles Gardner, Chinese Traditional Historiographyi Cambridge MA, 1961), p. 18.
  • 5E G Pulleyblank, " Chinese Historical Criticism:Liu Chih - chi and Ssu - ma Kuang", in Beasley and Pulleyblank, Historians of China and Japan ( London, 1961 ) , pp. 135- 166.
  • 6Benjamin Elman, From Philosophy to Philology.
  • 7L On- cho Ng, "A Tension in Ch' ing Thought:'Historicism' in Seventeenth - and - Eighteenth - Century Chinese Thought", Journal of the History of Ideas, 54(1993), p. 566; p. 581.
  • 8Jeffrey Stout, The Flight from Authority: Religion, Morality and the Quest for Autonomy(Notre Dame, 1981) .
  • 9Reinhard Koselleck, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (Cambridge MA, 1985) .
  • 10Karl L with, The Meaning of History (Chicago,1949) .

共引文献82

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部