期刊文献+

从里斯本战略到“欧洲2020”战略:基于治理演进视角的分析 被引量:6

From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020: An Analysis Based on the Evolution of Governance
原文传递
导出
摘要 里斯本战略的一个创新之处就在于引入了以"开放式协调法"为代表的软治理手段。然而,里斯本战略未获成功,除了因为战略设定的目标过高、过多以及缺乏重点和清晰度、透明度以外,主要被归咎于战略的治理结构过于软弱,由此产生了"实施缺口"。有鉴于此,本文分析了"欧洲2020"战略的治理手段有何改进或创新,是否从里斯本战略及其重启中吸取了经验与教训。本文结合政策学习理论指出,"欧洲2020"战略的治理手段只是工具性学习的结果,它们仍然维持在里斯本战略的软治理框架中。 One innovation of the Lisbon Strategy is the introduction of the soft governance tools introduced 'Open Method of Coordination' as an example.However,the failure of the Lisbon Strategy was not only resulted from its overwhelming targets and the lack of focus,transparency,as well as a clear definition,but more importantly from the weakness of the governance structure and the 'delivery gap' caused by it.In view of the facts aforementioned,this paper analyzes the governance tools of the Europe 2020 Strategy and discusses what improvements or innovations have been made,and whether experiences and lessons have been drawn from the Lisbon Strategy and its re-launch.Based on the policy learning theory this paper concludes that the governance tools introduced by the Europe 2020 Strategy are simply the result of the instrumental learning and still confined within the soft governance framework of the Lisbon Strategy.
作者 郑春荣
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期81-92,160-161,共12页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金 同济大学"211"三期重点建设项目"欧洲哲学与文化"(项目编号102110)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1European Council, "Presidency Conclusions", Brussels, 22 and 23 March 2005.
  • 2European Commission, "commission Staff Working Document, Lisbon Strategy Evaluation Docu-ment", SEE(2010) 114 final, Brussels, 2.2.2010.
  • 3European Commission, "Commission Working Document. Consultation of the Future 'EU 2020'Strategy", COM(2009) 647 final, Brussels, 24.11.2009.
  • 4European Commission, " Communication from the Commission, Europe 2020, A 5trategy lot Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth", COM(2010) 2020, Brussels, 3.3.2010.
  • 5European Council, "Conclusions", Brussels, 17 June 2010, p. 2.
  • 6Joachim Wilrmeling, "Was ist die Strategie 'Europa 2020' .9", EUD-konkret 3/2010, 16 Juni2010.
  • 7European Parliament, "EU 2020-Follow-up of the Informal European Council of 11 February2010, European Parliament Resolution of 10 March 2010 on EU 2020", P7_TA(2010)0053, Strasbourg, 10 March 2010, pt. B.
  • 8European Commission, "Commission Staff Working Document, Lisbon Strategy Evaluation Docu-ment", p. 4.
  • 9郑春荣.规范分析视角下的欧盟新型治理模式:“社会对话”[J].欧洲研究,2008,26(2):104-120. 被引量:6
  • 10郑春荣.欧洲社会对话的新制度主义解析[J].马克思主义与现实,2008,60(3):75-80. 被引量:2

二级参考文献60

  • 1郑春荣.新制度主义与欧盟研究[J].德国研究,2006,21(4):4-9. 被引量:1
  • 2Beate Kohler-Koeh and Berthold Rittberger eds. , Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union, Lanham: Roman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007.
  • 3Beate Kohler-Koch and Berthold Rittberger,"The ' Governance Turn' in EU Studies", Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 44 ( Supplement 1 ) ,2006, pp. 36 - 37.
  • 4Fritz W. Scharpf, "Die Politikverflechtungsfalle. Europaische Integration und deutscher Foderalismus im Verglelch", Polltische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1985, p. 324.
  • 5Wolfgang Streeck,“Politikverfleehtung und Entscheidungslucke: Zum Verhaltnis von zwischenstaatlichen Beziehungen und sozialen Interessen im europaischen Binnenmarkt”, in Karlheinz Bentele et al, eds. , Die Reformfahigkeit von Industriegesellschaften. Fritz W. Scharpf Festschrift zu seinem 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus Verlag, 1995, pp. 115 - 116.
  • 6http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_dialogue/docs/laeken01_en. pdf, 2007 年12月7日访问.
  • 7European Commission, "European Govemance-A White Paper", COM (2001) 428 final, Brussels, 2001.
  • 8European Commission, "Communication from the Commission. Towards a Reinforced Culture of Consultation and Dialogue - General Principles and Minimum Standards for Consultation of Interested Parties by the Commission", COM (2002) 704 final, Brussels, 20020
  • 9The Economic and Social Committee, "The Role and Contribution of Civil Society Organisations in the Building of Europe', CES 851/99 D/GW, Brussels, 1999, pt. 9.4.
  • 10European Commission, Report from the Commission on European Governance, COM (2002) 705 final, Brussels, 2002,pt. 3.1.3.

共引文献6

同被引文献84

  • 1王旭燕.面向未来的全球数字素养与能力标准框架——基于《2019年DQ全球标准报告》的分析[J].图书馆建设,2021(3):173-180. 被引量:21
  • 2陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,胡志刚,王贤文.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253. 被引量:6977
  • 3刘博.欧盟对外贸易与发展政策中的人权向度——从《洛美协定》到《科托努协定》[J].山东社会科学,2007(4):112-115. 被引量:3
  • 4钟龙彪.双层博弈理论:内政与外交的互动模式[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2007,24(2):61-67. 被引量:21
  • 5Commission of the European Communities. Objectives and Instruments of a Common Policy for Scientific Research and Technological Development[ R/OL]. COM(72)700 final, 14 June 1972. Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 6/72. http://aei. pitt. edu/5568/,2013 - 01 - 14.
  • 6Commission of the European Communities. Common Policy for Science and Technology [ DB/OL]. http://aei, pitt. edu/4589/1/ 4589. pdf,2011 - 07 - 3.
  • 7Independent Expert Panel. 5-Year Assessment of the European Community RTD Framework Programmes, March1997 [ DB/OL]. ht- tp ://aei. pitt. edu/6192/, 2013 - O1 - 20.
  • 8European Commission. The EU Budget Review, COM (2010)700 final. [ EB/OL]. http://eur-lex, europa, eu/LexUriServ/Lex- UriServ. do? uri = C OM :2010:0700 : FIN :EN : PDF,2013 - 01 - 20.
  • 9European Commission. Commission Staff Working Paper:The Added Value of the EU Budget. SEC ( 2011 ) 867 final. [ EB/OL]. ht- tp ://eur-lex. europa, eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ, do? uri = SEC :2011:0867 : FIN :'EN : PDF,2013 - 01 - 20.
  • 10The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Concerning the Fourth Framework Programme of the European Community Activities in the field of research and technological development and demonstration( 1994 to 1998 ) [ J ]. Official Journal of the European Communities,No L 126,1994:1 -33.

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部