期刊文献+

人类活动对柳林泉域水文过程影响研究 被引量:9

Effect of Human Activities on Hydrological Process of Liulin Springs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪50年代以后,柳林泉流量日益减少,人类活动成为其衰减的主要原因。通过分阶段应用灰色系统模型,定量地描述人类活动对柳林泉水文过程的影响。第一阶段(1957~1973年),柳林泉水流量只受自然条件的影响,第二阶段(1974~2009年)柳林泉水流量受自然条件和人类活动的双重影响。运用灰色关联分析和GM时滞模型,通过比较分析得到人类活动对柳林泉水文过程的影响。结果显示:人类活动导致泉水流量相对于降水量的时间滞后由0年增长到4年,即地下水压力波在传播过程中受到人类活动的干扰,强度被削弱,传播速度变缓。降水量对泉水流量的灰作用系数由第一阶段的1.127 2×10-2下降到了第二阶段的7.75×10-3,说明由于人类活动使降水量对泉水流量的补给强度减弱。 The flow of the Liulin springs has been declining since 1950s.It is believed that human activities is main reason to karst springs flow attenuation.The effect of human activities on hydrological process of Liulin springs was quantitatively described by using grey system.In the first stage(1957~1973),the flow of Liulin springs was only effected by natural conditions.In the second stage(1974~2009),the flow of Liulin springs was effected by climate and human activities.By using grey relational and GM model with time lags,we set up the hydrological models of Liulin springs for the two stages.Then the effect of human activities on Liulin spring flow was acquired by model comparison.The results show that the time lags between spring discharge and precipitation increase from 0 to 4 years.The groundwater pressure wave is disturbed by human activities.The strength of groundwater pressure wave is weaken,velocity slowed.The grey interaction coefficients reduce from 1.1272×10-2 in the first stage to 7.75×10-3 in the second stage.That is human activities lead to groundwater recharge decreasing.
出处 《水文》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期82-87,共6页 Journal of China Hydrology
基金 国家自然科学基金(40972165 40572150) 天津市自然科学基金(09JCYBJC27500) 天津市水资源与环境重点实验室开放基金(52XS1015)
关键词 地下水 灰色关联分析 GM(1 N)模型 人类活动 柳林泉 groundwater gray relational analysis GM(1 N) model human activity Liulin spring
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ford, D., P. Williams. 1989. Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology [M]. London: Unwin Hyman.
  • 2Jaquet, 0., P. Siegel, G. Klubertanz, H. Benabderrhamane. Stochastic discrete model of Karstic networks [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2004, 279(7): 751-760.
  • 3Leibundgut, C. Vulnerability of Karst Aquifers [M]. IAHS Publication, 1998, 45-60.
  • 4White, W.B. Geomorphology and Hydrology of Karst Terrains [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
  • 5Butscher, C., P. Huggenberger. Intrinsic vulnerability assessment in karst areas: a numerical modeling approach [J]. Water Resources Research, 2008, 44(2): 03408.
  • 6Taminskas, J., V. Marcinkevicius. Karst geoindicators of environmental change: the case of Lithuania [J]. Environmental Geology, 2002, 42(7): 757-766.
  • 7郭清海,王焰新,马腾,李录秀.山西岩溶大泉近50年的流量变化过程及其对全球气候变化的指示意义[J].中国科学(D辑),2005,35(2):167-175. 被引量:29
  • 8韩行瑞,鲁荣安,李庆松,等.山西岩溶大泉研究[M].北京:地质出版社,1993,294-305.
  • 9何宇彬,邹成杰.中国南北方喀斯特水特征对比[J].中国岩溶,1996,15(3):259-268. 被引量:7
  • 10郝永红,王玮,王国卿,杜欣,朱宇恩,王学萌.气候变化及人类活动对中国北方岩溶泉的影响——以山西柳林泉为例[J].地质学报,2009,83(1):138-144. 被引量:23

二级参考文献41

共引文献197

同被引文献121

引证文献9

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部