“半费之讼”问题如何解决

How to Resolve the Problem of Half Price Proceeding

师徒二人的辩词,由于违反同一律和矛盾律,故均不成立。把"半费之讼"当做是合同意义下的"第一场官司",是违反一条叫做逻辑先后律的思维原则的,这是造成人们思想混乱和困惑的逻辑根源。制定合同,却不曾考虑到规则的例外情况,这是造成人们思想困惑的认知原因。法官判决之后,不再执行合同,是问题获解的唯一合理途径。

The master and prentice＇ s arguments are all invalid since they violate the law of identity and the law of contradiction. Taking the half price proceeding as the first lawsuit under the contract actually goes against the principle of thinking named the law of logic order, which is also the logic reason causing human beings＇ confusion in thinking. When constituting a contract, giving no consideration to exceptional cases of the rules cognitively accounts for human beings＇ confusion in thought. After the judger＇ s judgment, termination of the contract is the only reasonable solution to this problem.