《中华人民共和国合同法》之无权处分考析——从传统民法角度分析

Analysis of Disposition without Right from Contract Law of the People's Republic of China——In the Perspective of Traditional Civil Law

无权处分被称作"民法学上的精灵",在德国法上指处分行为,处分行为以有处分权为生效要件,因此,无权处分行为在效力上为效力待定行为。《中华人民共和国合同法》第51条将无权处分界定为待追认的法律行为,即将此债权行为的效力定位于效力待定,从而引起无权处分制度与善意取得、瑕疵担保等制度的冲突与矛盾,而这些冲突与矛盾在德国法下是不存在的。笔者试图从传统民法角度准确把握《中华人民共和国合同法》上的无权处分制度,并探求合理妥当的解释其法学肌理的路径。

As ＂the elves＂ of civil law,entitled to dispose in Germany law refers to sanction actions,The disciplinary right of disposal action to have effective elements,so,for Entitled to sanction actions in effectiveness for effectiveness undetermined behavior.Our country ＂contract law＂ the article 51 shall not be entitled to dispose of ratification for to define the legal behavior,Will the creditor＇s rights behavior located in effect a backlog,Thus cause has no right to sanction system and good faith acquisition,such institutional defect warranty of conflict and contradiction,And these conflicts,contradictions in Germany method is nonexistent.The author tries to from traditional civil law Angle of Chinese contract law accurately grasp on to sanction system,And explore the reasonable explanation is the law of the path of the texture.