权利要求解释、等同原则与禁止反悔:专利審查档案的法律效力 评最高人民法院午时药业提審案(2009)民提字第20号
被引量：1
Claim Construction,Doctrine of Equivalents and Estoppel Legal Effect of Patent Prosecution History with Comments on the Supreme People's Court's Review of Wushi Pharmaceutical(No.Mintizi 20/2009)
摘要
午时药业提审案是最高人民法院精选出作为《最高人民法院知识产权案件年度报告》（2010）示范指导案例之一。此案最引入关注的法律问题莫过於专利审查档案在权利要求解释、等同技术特徵认定和“禁止反悔”原则适用中的法律作用。
出处
《中国专利与商标》
2011年第3期3-17,共15页
China Patents & Trademarks
参考文献9
-
1Article 59 paragraph one, of the Patent Law of P.R. China: The extent of protection for a patent for invention or utility model shall be determined by the terms of the claims. The description and the appended drawings may be used to interpret the content of the claims.
-
2In the amendment to these Opinions circulated for comments, this provision has changed a great deal. See Article 54 of the Draft of the Opinions on Several Issues Relating to Patent Infringement Adjudication issued for comments (April 2011).
-
3By the doctrine of estoppel is meant that where during the patent prosecution or invalidation procedure, a patentee narrows, or surrenders a part of, the claims through written statement, or amendment made to the application or the patent, the court hearing infringement action must not allow the patentee to recapture what he has delimited, excluded, or surrendered by using the doctrine of equivalents in a later infringement action. Article 56.
-
4The doctrine of estoppel should applies only when the following conditions are met: (1) the narrowing or surrendering of the relevant technical features by a patent applicant or patentee must be explicit in the patent documentation, valid and final decision of validity or administrative decisions; and (2) the technical content so narrowed or surrendered must have material effect on the grant or maintenance of the patent.
-
5535 U.S. 722 (21)02).
-
6234 F.3d 558 (Fed. Cir. 2000).
-
7See Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc., v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17, 39-40 (1997).
-
8See, e.g., Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc., v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17, 37-38 (1997).
-
9See Article 35 of the Opinions on Several Issues Relating to Patent Infringement Adjudication: "Equivalents shall be interchangeable between technical features, not between two technical solutions as a whole.".
-
1田晓正,田继安.贝叶斯定理在审案中的应用[J].漯河职业技术学院学报,2007,6(3):19-20.
-
2马云鹏.权利要求解释中主题名称作用的探析[J].中国发明与专利,2017,14(2):97-102. 被引量：3
-
3杨树勍,齐素英.二阶超线性奇异方程的正周期解问题[J].忻州师范学院学报,2006,22(2):28-30.
-
4刘江来,阮锡超,李高嵩,顾文强,黄瀚雄.大亚湾中微子实验的物理研究之专题六(能量刻度研究)年度报告[J].科技资讯,2016,14(22):178-178.
-
5朱力宇,沈太霞.立法效力的界定[J].北京联合大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2010,8(3):100-104. 被引量：2
-
6去年是中国证券市场的裂变之年[J].辽宁经济统计,2008(3):38-39.
-
731省(区、市)自主创新年度数据[J].领导决策信息,2014(11):30-31.
-
8张姝.论合同法律效力的范围[J].法制与经济,2009,18(24):76-77. 被引量：1
-
9原料价格暴涨 影响中科三环业绩[J].稀土信息,2008,14(4):23-23.
-
10海大集团2015上半年营收96．5亿元[J].海洋与渔业,2015,0(8):15-15.
