中美双反措施争端案评析

Comments on Sino-US Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties Disputes

2011年3月,中美双反措施争端案(美国对来自中国产品的反补贴和反倾销措施案)的审理程序告一段落。该案历经专家组和上诉机构程序,首次将反补贴和反倾销措施诉诸一体,在世界贸易多边体制中引起反响。在专家组程序中,中国的主张几乎全盘被否定。而在上诉机构报告中,中国有关公共机构和双重救济的申诉得到支持。针对本案的法律争议,有关公共机构、专向性、利益计算、双重救济等问题的申诉仍有待于进一步探讨。中美双反措施争端案也为我国充分运用WTO规则维护国家贸易和经济利益提供了有益的启示。

By March, 2011, Sino-US Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties Disputes, namely US-Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China has undergone the panel and appellate body procedure, which echoes rise in the multilateral trade system around the world. Few of China＇s claims were supported by the panel; however, claims on public body and double remedy were uphold by appellate body. Further exploration is expected to unfold on issues such as public body, specificity, benefit calculation and double remedies. The case also provides with us beneficial indications on safeguarding national trade and economic interests.