期刊文献+

科技型中小企业政府资助效应提升研究——基于企业生命周期的观点 被引量:46

Research on the Promotion Effect of Government Funding on Science and Technology-oriented Small and Medium Sized Enterprises——Based on Enterprise Life Cycle
原文传递
导出
摘要 为促进科技型中小企业在自主创新创业、促进经济增长和解决就业等方面发挥更为重要的作用,政府以创新基金、小巨人基金等形式对科技型中小企业进行了直接资助。但是,研究发现,在企业生命周期发展的不同阶段中,由于政府直接资助金额与科技型中小企业所需要的资金额之间存在着不同程度的缺口,导致政府资助效应在不同企业生命周期的差异。为提升政府对科技型中小企业的资助效应,本文建议调整政府对不同生命周期企业的直接资助力度,将部分直接资助的财政资金转变为贷款担保再保险基金,充分发挥政府财政资金的杠杆作用与示范带头作用,撬动与带动更多的社会资金进入到科技型中小企业中去,以弥补政府直接资助金额与企业所需资金额的巨大缺口。 To promote high- tech SMEs play a more important role in independent of innovation and entrepreneurship, promote economic growth and employment solutions, government give innovation fund,a small giant funds and other forms of direct assistance to high-tech SME. But the research discovered that in different stages of the business life-cycle development, the different levels of the gap between direct government funding and the funding necessary of SME, leading to the differences of government-funded enterprises in different life- cycle. To enhance the government's SME funding effect, this paper proposed to adjust the different government direct funding efforts in life cycle of enterprises, part of the direct funding will be into a loan guarantee reinsurance fund, give full play to the leverage of government funds and exemplary role, leveraging and bring more money into the SME community to go to make up for the amount of direct government funding and the amount of money required for the huge gap in business.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期150-158,共9页 China Industrial Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年项目"我国科技型中小企业不同发展阶段的资助效应研究"(批准号10YJC790061)
关键词 科技型中小企业 企业生命周期 政府资助效应 high-tech SMEs business life cycle government funding effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Asch, L. Credit Scoring: A Tool for More Efficient SME Lending[R]. SME/SSUES New Ideas from the World ofSmall and Medium Enterprises, 2000.
  • 2Barro R. J. Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, (98).
  • 3Carpenter R., Petersen B. Is the Growth of Small Firms Constrained by Internal Finance [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002, (8).
  • 4David P. A., Hall B H. Heart of Darkness: Modeling Public-private Funding Interactions inside the R&D Black Box[J]. Research Policy, 2000,(29).
  • 5Greiner L. E. Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow[J]. Harvard Business Review,1972, (4).
  • 6Galbraith, J. The Stages of Growth[J]. Journal of Business Strategy, 1982,4(3).
  • 7Kazanjian, R.K. Relation of Dominant Problems to Stages of Growth in Technology-based Ventures [J]. Academy of Management Jourral, 1988, (2).
  • 8Jayaratne,J.,Wollen, J. How Important Are Small Banks to Small Business Lending [J]. Journal of Bankingand Fiance, 1999, (23).
  • 9Lichtenberg, Frank R. The Effect of Government Funding on Private Industrial Research and Development: A Re-assessment[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics 1987, (36).
  • 10IMilbourne R. Public Investment and Economic Growth[J]. Applied Economic 2003, (35).

二级参考文献130

共引文献958

同被引文献502

引证文献46

二级引证文献404

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部