摘要
目的考查父母和教师使用《听觉整合问卷》(meaningful auditory integration scale,MAIS)评估听障儿童听觉发展情况的一致性。方法请81名听障儿童的父母和康复教师分别利用MAIS中的父母问卷和教师问卷对儿童进行评估,对父母问卷和教师问卷的得分进行统计分析。结果①整体上,父母问卷的得分高于教师问卷的得分,差异极显著(t=4.970,P=0.000);②在信心分、警觉分和意义分3个维度上,父母问卷的得分也显著高于教师问卷得分(t1=2.115,p1=0.037;t2=5.340,P2=0.000;t3=3.553,P3=0.001)。结论父母和教师在使用MAIS评估听障儿童的听觉发展情况时存在不一致,有待于扩大样本量或追踪进行进一步研究。
Objective To examine the consistency between parents and teachers in evaluating hearing-impaired children with Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale(MAIS). Methods The parents and rehabilitation teachers of 81 hearing-impaired children were included in this study. They evaluated the children's auditory development, separately using MAIS-Parent Questionnaire and MAIS-Teacher Questionnaire respectively. Results ① On the whole, the scores from the Parent Questionnaire were significantly higher than those from the Teacher Questionnaire(t=4.970,P=.000). ② As for the Reliance, the Alerting and the Meaning Scores, there were also significant differences between the parents and the teachers(t1=2.115,P1=O.037;t2=5.340,P2=0.000;t3=3.553,P3=0.O01). The scores from the parents were higher. Conclusion The parents and the teachers are inconsistent in the assessment about the children's auditory ability with MAIS. A larger sample and long-term research is necessary and important.
出处
《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》
2011年第4期74-76,共3页
Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
基金
基金项目:言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室开放课题基金资助项目(项目编号:KFDX03201001)
关键词
听觉整合问卷(MAIS)
听障儿童
父母
教师
一致性
Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale(MAIS)
Hearing-impaired children
Parent
Teacher
Consistency