期刊文献+

父母和教师使用《听觉整合问卷》评估听障儿童的一致性研究 被引量:4

A Consistent Study between Parents and Teachers in Evaluating Hearing-impaired Children with MAIS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考查父母和教师使用《听觉整合问卷》(meaningful auditory integration scale,MAIS)评估听障儿童听觉发展情况的一致性。方法请81名听障儿童的父母和康复教师分别利用MAIS中的父母问卷和教师问卷对儿童进行评估,对父母问卷和教师问卷的得分进行统计分析。结果①整体上,父母问卷的得分高于教师问卷的得分,差异极显著(t=4.970,P=0.000);②在信心分、警觉分和意义分3个维度上,父母问卷的得分也显著高于教师问卷得分(t1=2.115,p1=0.037;t2=5.340,P2=0.000;t3=3.553,P3=0.001)。结论父母和教师在使用MAIS评估听障儿童的听觉发展情况时存在不一致,有待于扩大样本量或追踪进行进一步研究。 Objective To examine the consistency between parents and teachers in evaluating hearing-impaired children with Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale(MAIS). Methods The parents and rehabilitation teachers of 81 hearing-impaired children were included in this study. They evaluated the children's auditory development, separately using MAIS-Parent Questionnaire and MAIS-Teacher Questionnaire respectively. Results ① On the whole, the scores from the Parent Questionnaire were significantly higher than those from the Teacher Questionnaire(t=4.970,P=.000). ② As for the Reliance, the Alerting and the Meaning Scores, there were also significant differences between the parents and the teachers(t1=2.115,P1=O.037;t2=5.340,P2=0.000;t3=3.553,P3=0.O01). The scores from the parents were higher. Conclusion The parents and the teachers are inconsistent in the assessment about the children's auditory ability with MAIS. A larger sample and long-term research is necessary and important.
出处 《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》 2011年第4期74-76,共3页 Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation
基金 基金项目:言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室开放课题基金资助项目(项目编号:KFDX03201001)
关键词 听觉整合问卷(MAIS) 听障儿童 父母 教师 一致性 Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale(MAIS) Hearing-impaired children Parent Teacher Consistency
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1王丽燕,梁巍,主编.小龄儿童听觉发展评测工具.北京:三辰影库音像出版社,2009:4.
  • 2Anderson I, Weichbold V, et al. Cochlear Implantation in childrenunder the age of two-what do the outcomes show us? International Journal of Pediatric ORL, 2004,68(4):425-451.
  • 3Allum JHJ, Greisiger R, et al. Auditory perception and speechidentification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol. British Journal of Audiology, 2000,34:293-505.
  • 4Robbins AM, R, enshaw JJ, et al. Evaluating meaningfulauditory integration in profoundly hearing impaired children. American Journal of Otology, 1991, 12(suppl): 144-150.
  • 5陈雪清,王靓,孔颖,刘莎,刘博,莫玲燕,王硕,吴燕君,韩娜,孟黎晖,李海珍.用有意义听觉整合量表评估儿童人工耳蜗植入后听觉能力[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(2):112-115. 被引量:39

二级参考文献4

  • 1Robbins AM,Rneshaw JJ,Berry SW.Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing impaired children.Am J Otol,1991,12 Suppl:144-150.
  • 2Osberger MJ,Geier L,Zimmerman-Phillips S,et al.Use of a parent-report scale to assess benefit in children given the Clarion cochlear implant.Am J Otol,1997,18(Suppl):S79-80.
  • 3Allum JH,Greisiger R,Straubhaar S,et al.Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol.Br J Audiol,2000,34:293-303.
  • 4Mondain M,Sillon M,Vieu A,et al.Cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children with residual hearing.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol,2002,63:91-97.

共引文献38

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部