期刊文献+

结肠液囊管一期修复结肠吻合口漏的动物实验研究 被引量:2

Colonic sac duct for first-stage repair of colon anastomotic leakage in miniature pigs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研制结肠液囊管作为一种安全可靠的新技术对结直肠吻合口漏进行有效的一期修复。方法将西藏小型猪随机分为2组,处理组与对照组,每组15头,处理组采用结肠液囊管对结肠吻合口漏进行一期修补,对照组以传统一期吻合口漏缝合近段结肠造瘘,二期结肠回纳手术。在修补术后第7、14、21天检测吻合口漏愈合情况:吻合口漏部位的愈合强度——爆破压、愈合部位组织中微血管密度及羟脯氨酸含量。结果结肠液囊管能够修复结肠吻合口漏,两组均无动物死亡,无肠管狭窄及坏死。术后第7、14天处理组爆破压、羟脯氨酸含量、微血管密度均高于对照组,但术后第21天两组无显著性差别。结论应用结肠液囊管技术一期修复结肠吻合口漏是安全、可靠且有效。特别是在结直肠吻合口漏48~72h以上,腹腔严重感染的环境下能有效修复结直肠吻合口漏。 Objective To study the efficacy,safety and reliability of colonic sac duct for first-stage repair of colorectal anastomotic leakage.Methods An animal model of colon anastomotic leakage was established in 30 Tibet miniature pigs,which were randomly divided into treatment group and control group(n=15).Colon anastomotic leakage in the treatment group was repaired using the colonic sac duct,while the control group received conventional surgical repair.At 7,14,and 21 days after the surgery,the healing of the anastomotic leakage was evaluated by examining the bursting pressure,tissue microvessel density and hydroxyproline content at the anastomosis.Results Using the colonic sac duct,the anastomotic leakage was successfully repaired without death of the pigs or the occurrence of intestinal stenosis or necrosis.At 7 and 14 days after the surgery,the bursting pressure,hydroxyproline contents,and microvessel density in the treatment groups were higher than those in the control group,but such difference was not found at 21 days.Conclusion Colonic sac duct allows effective repair of colon anastomotic leakage,and is especially useful for leakage lasting for 48-72 h complicated by severe abdominal infection.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期1249-1251,共3页 Journal of Southern Medical University
基金 广州市医药卫生科技项目(201102A213001)
关键词 结肠液囊管 结肠吻合口漏 一期修复 腹腔镜 colonic sac duct colon anastomotic leakage first stage repair laparoscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1余龙龙,陈震宏,陈栋.直肠癌前切除术后吻合口瘘的危险因素及对策[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2009,15(1):29-31. 被引量:16
  • 2Amrani L, M6nard C, Berdah S, et al. From iatrogenic digestive perforation to complete anastomotic disunion: endoscopic stenting as a new concept of "stent-guided regeneration and re- epithelialization[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 69(7): 1282-7.
  • 3Laurent C, Nobili S, Rullier A, et al. Efforts to improve local control in rectal cancer compromise survival by the potential morbidity of optimal mesorectal excision [J]. J Am Coil Surg, 2006, 203(5): 684-91.
  • 4Mazeh H, Samet Y, Abu-wasel B, et al. Application of a novel severity grading system for surgical complications after colorectal resection[J]. J Am Coil Surg, 2009, 208(3): 355-61.
  • 5Kanellos I, Vasiliadis K, Angelopoulos S, et al. Anastomotic lea- kage following anterior resection for rectal cancer [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2004, 8(Suppl 1): s79-81.
  • 6Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2005, 92(2): 211-6.
  • 7Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review:healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I[J]. Microsurgery, 2006, 26(3): 131-6.
  • 8Iqbal CW, Chun YS, Farley DR. Colonoscopic perforations:a retrospective review[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2005, 9(9): 1229-36.
  • 9Christensen H, Langfelt S, Laurberg S. Bursting strength of experimental colonic anastomoses.a methodological study [J]. Eur Surg Res, 1993, 25(1): 38-45.
  • 10WenY(文言).Effects of Ca2+ and S—3307 on physiological property and yield in winter wheat[J].Liao Ning Agriculture Sciences (辽宁农业科学),1999,(2):18-20.

二级参考文献6

共引文献15

同被引文献20

  • 1Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection ( laparoscopic colectomy ) [ J ] . Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1 (3): 144-150.
  • 2Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carci- noma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 (21): 3061- 3068.
  • 3Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group. A com- parison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer [J] . N Engl J Med, 2004, 350 (20): 2050-2059.
  • 4Fleshman J, Sargent D J, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2007, 246 (4):655-662.
  • 5Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial [ J] . Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10 (1) : 44-52.
  • 6Merrill RM, Anderson AE. Risk-adjusted colon and rectal cancer incidence rates in the United States [ J ] . Dis Co- lon Rectum, 2011, 54 (10): 1301-1306.
  • 7Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates in the United States by tumorloca- tion and stage, 1992-2008 [ J ] . Cancer Epidemiol Bio- markers Prey, 2012, 21 (3) : 411-416.
  • 8Murphy G, Devesa SS, Cross A J, et al. Sex disparities in colorectal cancer incidence by anatomic subsite, race and age [J] . Int J Cancer, 2011, 128 (7): 1668- 1675.
  • 9Jullumstro E, Wibe A, Lydersen S, et al. Colon cancer incidence, presentation, treatment and outcomes over 25 years [J] .Colorectal Dis, 2011, 13 (5): 512-518.
  • 10Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial [ J] . Ann Surg Oncol, 2008, 15 (9):2418-2425.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部