期刊文献+

消费群体异质、政府特质和房产泡沫——基于一个政治经济学模型和70个城市的面板数据 被引量:1

The Divergence of Consumers,Government Characteristics and Real Estate Bubble:An Analysis Based on a Political Economy Model and Panel Data Including 70 Cities
原文传递
导出
摘要 富裕阶层、普通阶层对房产市场调控力度的不同诉求,会影响到政府调控力度的选择。富裕阶层期望弱的调控力度,进而大的泡沫,普通阶层则相反。把社会稳定作为一个重要目标的政府,通过权衡这两个阶层的利益诉求,进而选择适当的调控力度,来最大化其政治利益。我们认为,贫富差距和政府公正度对调控力度有正向影响。本文利用全国70个城市2002到2008年的面板数据,对该假说进行了验证。 The rich agents and poor agents expect different levels of regulation in the real estate market. The rich agents expect a weaker regulation level,then a larger bubble,while the poor agents expect the opposite. And their expectations will influence the government's decision .The stability of the society is one of the most important goal of the government,so the government will decide the regulation level by balancing these two agents’ interests and in this way the government can get the greatest political benefit. We suppose that the impact of the inequality and government bias to the regulation level is positive. And using a panel date from 2002 to 2008 including 70 cities,we test our proposition.
作者 刘洪钟 齐震
机构地区 辽宁大学
出处 《中国经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期10-19,共10页 China Economic Studies
关键词 房产调控 泡沫度 贫富差距 政府公正度 Regulation Level of Real Estate Bubble Inequality Government Bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Arellano M, Bover O. 1995. Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models [ J ]. Jour-hal of Econometrics,68 ( 1 ) : 29 - 51.
  • 2AreUano M, Bond S. 1991. Some Test of Specification For Panel Data:Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations [ J 1. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (4) : 277 - 297.
  • 3Benabou R J. 1996. Inequality and Growth[ Z]. NBER Working paper,No. 5658.
  • 4Blundell R, Bond S. 1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Restriction in Dynamic Panel Data Models [ J ]. Journal of E- conometrics ,87 ( 1 ) : 115 - 147.
  • 5Bond S. 2002. Dynamic Panel Data Models : a Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice [ J ]. Portuguese Economics Jour- nal, 1(2) :141 -162.
  • 6Case K E, Shiller R J, Quigley J M. 2005. Comparing Wealth Effects:the Stock Market versus the Housing Market [ Z ] . NBER Working paper, No. W8606.
  • 7Edelsteina R H, Sau K L. 2004. House Price, Wealth Effects, and the Singapore Macroeconomy [ J ]. Journal of Housing Economics, 13 (4) : 342 - 367.
  • 8Guo F,Huang Y S. 2010. Does Hot Money Drive China's Real Estate and Stock Market? [J]. International Review of Economics and Finance ,19(3 ) :452 -466.
  • 9Grandmont J M. 1978. Intermediate Preferences and Majority Rule [ J ]. Econometrica,46 ( 2 ) : 317 - 330.
  • 10Jin H, Qian Y and Weingast B. 2005. Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives:Federalism , Chinese Style [ J ]. Journal of Public Economics, 89 (9 - 10 ) : 1719 - 1742.

二级参考文献142

共引文献6095

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部