期刊文献+

社会建构论与质化研究 被引量:4

On Social Constructionism and Qualitative Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 质化研究和量化研究建立在不同的本体论、认识论和方法论的哲学基础上。量化研究主要以实证主义为基础,而质化研究更多建立在社会建构论的原理上。社会建构论有关实在是社会的建构、建构过程的多元化和方法多样化主张契合了质化研究的需要。质化研究扎根于具体的文化情境,在社会互动和人际交往中,在动态和发展的过程中了解被研究者的主体体验,具有量化研究无可比拟的优势。 Qualitative research differs from quantitative research as they are based on different philosophical assumptions like ontology,epistemology and methodology.Quantitative research is based on Positivism,while qualitative research is more centered on social constructionism.Such opinions of Social Constructionism,like reality is society's construction,the diversified constructing process and the varieties of methods,accord with the needs of qualitative research.Qualitative research is rooted in concrete cultural context.It can see the subject's subjective experience in the dynamic developing process,which is an unparalleled advantage compared with quantitative research.
作者 叶浩生
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期75-79,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 羊城学者首席科学家资助项目(10A030S)
关键词 社会建构论 质化研究 心理学 方法论 认识论 social constructionism qualitative research psychology methodology epistemology
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1O'Neill P. Tectonic Change: The Qualitative Paradigm in Psychology [J]. Canadian Psychology, 2002, 43:190-194.
  • 2Denzin N, Lincoln Y. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (The Third Edition) [M]. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, 2005.
  • 3Delyser D. Teaching Qualitative Research [J]. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 2008, 32(2) : 234.
  • 4Streiner D. Qualitative Research in Psychiatry [J]. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2008, 53(3) :135.
  • 5Dobrovolny J & Fuentes S, Quantitative versus QualitativeEvaluation: A Tool to Decide which to Use [J]. Perform anee Improvement, 2008, 47(4) :8-10.
  • 6Camic P, Rhodes J & Yardley L. Naming the Stars: In tegrating Qualitative Methods into Psychological Research. In Carnie P. (Ed) Qualitative Research in Psychology.. Ex panding Perspectives in Methodology and Design [M]. A merican Psychological Association, 2003 : 3- 15.
  • 7Delamater J D & Hude J S. Essentialism vs. Social Constructionism in the Study of Human Sexuality [J]. Journal of Sex Research. 1998, 35(1): 10-19.
  • 8Rudes J, Guteman J. The Value of Social Constructionism for the Counseling Profession: A Reply to Hansen [J]. Journal of Counseling & Development, 2007, 85 (fall) : 388.
  • 9Gergen K. Social Construction in Context [M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2001: 8.
  • 10Gergen K. Psychological Xcience in a Postmodern Context [J]. American Psychologist. 2001, 56(10):803-813.

同被引文献67

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部