新霉素ELISA检测方法的建立

Development of Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Neomycin

目的:比较直接和间接竞争酶联免疫法(enzyme linked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)的优缺点,建立新霉素残留ELISA检测方法。方法:利用自制的新霉素多克隆抗体,采用直接竞争和间接竞争ELISA方法检测新霉素残留,并比较两种方法的优缺点。结果:新霉素抗血清和庆大霉素的交叉反应率为2.04%,和卡那霉素的交叉反应率为0.02%,和氨苄青霉素、红霉素、四环素的交叉反应率均小于0.01%。初步测试新霉素间接竞争ELISA法的准确性和回收率。板内误差小于4%,板间误差小于11%,回收率为135.5%～191.3%。直接竞争和间接竞争ELISA方法的检测极限分别为28.58ng/mL和51.74ng/mL,达到了国家对新霉素规定的500μg/kg MRL检测限。结论:建立了直接竞争和间接ELISA吸附检测方法,条件优化更成功的间接竞争ELISA可用于开发新霉素检测试剂盒。

In this study, we describe the advantages and disadvantages of direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay （dc-ELISA） and indirect competitive ELISA （idc-ELISA） and ELISA methods for the detection of neomycin. Antineomycin polyclonal antibodies were prepared and used to detect neomycin by dc-ELISA and idc-ELISA. The cross-reaction rates of prepared anti-neomycin polyclonal antibodies with gentamincin and kanamycin were 2.04% and 0.02%, respectively, and with ampicillin, erythromycin and tetracycline all less than 0.01%. The accuracy and recovery of idc-ELISA were tested with an intra-plate error of less than 4%, an inter-plate error of less than 11% and a recovery between 135.5% and 191.3%. The detection limits of dc-ELISA and idc-ELISA were 28.58 ng/mL and 51.74 ng/mL, respectively, both of which were below the national maximum residue limit （MRL） of 500 pg/kg. Therefore, a dc-ELISA method and an idc-ELISA method to detect neomycin have successfully established. Further, the idc-ELISA method where the working conditions were better optimized can be used for the development of neomycin test kit.