期刊文献+

婚姻匹配的变迁:社会开放性的视角 被引量:104

Trends of Status Homogamy in China:A dual-trait analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以择偶配对的内婚性程度作为社会开放性的指标,使用中国综合社会调查2006年数据,通过对婚姻先赋性和自致性匹配在各历史时期变化的实证考察,评估不平等结构代际传递的过程和趋势。本文在理论上对两种匹配强度组合和代际不平等结构传递的关系进行了讨论,并相应在模型上使用双配分析方法以控制代际流动的影响,从技术上实现了对婚姻配对独立净效应的估计。分析发现改革开放以来婚姻自致性匹配度大幅度提高,先赋性匹配呈现倒U型的小幅波动。这一结果暗示当前不平等结构传递的特征为"父系再生产强化"模式,而社会开放性程度可能将有所下降。 Status Homogamy can be regarded as an indicator of the 'openness' of society.This article applies the study of homogamy to an exploration of the social structural transformation in China between 1949 and 2006.Based on the data of Chinese General Social Survey 2006,this paper uses the couple's education and their fathers' social statuses to demonstrate the changing pattern(s) of marriage choice.Different from the traditional single-trait model,this study adopts a dual-trait model,placing ascriptive and achievement-oriented match into one single-model simultaneously.It aims at effectively controlling the intergenerational mobility effects.The analyses show that,since the reform,the educational homogamy has been steadily increasing,while the matching of family background draws an up-side-down U-shape curve.These results imply a resurgence of patrilineal society,in which the structure of inequality is reproduced and consolidated by unilateral descent.
作者 李煜
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期122-136,244-245,共15页 Sociological Studies
基金 国家社科基金(青年)项目"当代中国的代际流动"(项目编号08CSH014) 教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目"我国目前阶层状况研究"的阶段性成果之一 上海浦江人才计划 上海社会科学院社会转型与发展重点研究项目资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献79

  • 1路风.单位:一种特殊的社会组织形式[J].中国社会科学,1989(1):71-88. 被引量:506
  • 2徐安琪.择偶标准:五十年变迁及其原因分析[J].社会学研究,2000(6):18-30. 被引量:193
  • 3林南 边燕杰.《中国城市中的就业与地位获得过程》[A].边燕杰主编.《市场转型与社会分层—美国社会学者分析中国》[C].三联书店,2002/1991..
  • 4Goodman, Leo A. (1979), Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Crossclassifications Having Ordered Categories ,Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74,537-552.
  • 5Goodman,Leo A. ,and Michael Hout(1998),Statistical Methods and Graphical Displays for Comparing How Two-Way Associations Vary among Countries, among Groups,or over Time. Sociological Methodology. Vol. 28: 175-239.
  • 6Hout, Michael( 1983), Mobility Tables. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publications.
  • 7Hunt,Thomas C. (1940), Occupational Status and Marriage Selection. American Sociological Review. 5: 495-505.
  • 8Kalmijn, Matthijs( 1998), Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. Annual Review of Sociology. 24 : 395-421.
  • 9Raftery, Adrian E. (1995), Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research, Sociological Methodology. Vol. 25: 111-163.
  • 10Smits,Jeroen, Wout Ultee, and Jan Lammers. (1998), Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries:An Explanation of Differences in Openness Using Country-Level Explanatory Variables. American Sociological Review. 63 : 264-285.

共引文献730

引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部