期刊文献+

死缓适用实质条件之理论构建——宽恕理论之提倡 被引量:5

Theory Construction of Essential Factors Applicable to Stay of Execution——Promoting Theory of Forgiveness
原文传递
导出
摘要 司法实践表明,目前我国死缓适用实质条件的理论学说并不能为死缓适用提供科学的理论指导,应在借鉴心理学中"宽恕理论"的基础上建构死缓适用实质条件的新理论。死缓适用的实质条件是:(1)罪恶深重尚未达到令人无法容忍的程度,即罪行的社会危害性刚刚达到或不过分地超过罪行极其严重的下限标准;(2)犯罪人有认罪、悔罪或者其他值得宽恕的情节,即罪犯的主观恶性、人身危险性不大。上述条件同时具备时,才能对罪该处死刑者适用死缓。 Judicial practice indicates the theory of essential factors of stay of execution couldn't provides a scientific instruction for applying stay of execution at present in China. Based on theory of forgiveness in psychology, this article has built a new theory of essential factors of stay of execution. The theory main- tains that the essential factors of stay of execution include: the offence is sinful but has not reached the degree unable to tolerate, in other words, the social harmfulness of the crime only reaches or no more than going beyond the lower limit of criminals that commit the most serious crime; the criminal has plead guilty or shows repentance or other circumstances worthy of forgiveness, in other word, the malice on the part of the criminal and personal danger of the criminal is not so serious. Only above-mentioned conditions are simultaneously satisfied, can it be suitable to apply stay of execution to the criminal who deserves to die.
作者 任志中 周蔚
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期70-75,共6页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词 死缓适用 宽恕理论 社会危害性 量刑 application of stay of execution theory of forgiveness social harmfulness sentencing
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献71

  • 1Denton R T, Martin, M W. Defining forgiveness: An empirical exploration of process and role. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 1998, 26(4): 281~292
  • 2中国科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典.第2版.北京:商务印书管,1993.658
  • 3Kaminer D, Stein D J, Mbanga I, Zungu-Dirwayi N. Forgiveness: Toward an integration of theoretical models. Psychiatry, 2000, 63(4):344~357
  • 4Pingleton J P. Why we don't forgive: A biblical and object relations theoretical model for understanding failures in the forgiveness process. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 1997, 25:403~413
  • 5Hargrave T D, Sells J N. The development of a forgiveness scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 1997, 23(1): 41~53
  • 6North J. Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy, 1987, 62:336~352
  • 7Enright R D, the Human Development Study Group. The moral development of forgiveness. In: Kurtines W, Gerwitz J (Eds.).Handbook of moral behavior and development. Erlbaum, 1991.123~152
  • 8McCullough M E, Worthington E L, Rachal K C. Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73:321~336
  • 9Zechmeister J S, Romero C. Victim and offender accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives of forgiveness and unforgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(4): 675~686
  • 10Rye M S, Loiacono D N, Folic C D, Olszewski B T. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales. Current Psychology, 2001, 20(3): 260~277

共引文献189

同被引文献74

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部