期刊文献+

不同阳极滤过器组合的乳腺DR成像性能对比 被引量:1

Experiments on Choice of the Anode/Filter Combination for Digital Mammography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对数字乳腺X射线摄影不同阳极和滤过器组合成像性能进行对比。方法采用不同厚度乳腺成像体模、选择不同的阳极/滤过器组合,在自动曝光模式下成像。测量图像信噪比和腺体吸收剂量,并引入图像品质因数综合评价成像性能的好坏。结果对于不同厚度的乳腺体模,使用钨铑组合平均腺体剂量比其他组合可以降低25%~42%,图像品质因数高于其他组合5%~37%。随着腺体厚度的增加平均腺体吸收剂量逐步增加,而图像信噪比则与平均腺体吸收剂量成反比。结论当体模厚度在4~9cm时,钨铑组合成像性能最佳,因此在临床使用中应充分考虑临床实际需要来选择适宜成像技术,在保证临床图像质量的同时尽量降低受检者的辐射风险。 Objective To study on the choice of the anode/filter combination for digital mammography system.Methods mammography accreditation phantom with phantom thickness from 4 cm to 9 cm was used to simulate human breast tissue and three different combinations of anode/filter material were employed under the automatic exposure mode.The image signal to noise ratio(SNR) and mean glandular dose(MGD) were measured.The figure of merit(FOM) was used to evaluate the imaging performance of digital mammography.Results For 6~9cm phantom thicknesses,the MGD of tungsten anode and rhodium filter combination(W/Rh) can be lower by 25%~42% than other two combinations;the FOM of W/Rh achieved higher by 5%~37% than others.The SNR was decreased with the increase of phantom thickness,and the MGD was getting higher with thicker phantom.Conclusion Based on these measurements,the use of the W/Rh anode/filter has the best imaging performance,so the optimization for digital mammography is very important for clinical use in order to keep the good image quality and reduce the radiation dose.
出处 《中国医疗设备》 2011年第7期27-29,共3页 China Medical Devices
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30870751) 北京市卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才培养计划项目(2009-3-57)
关键词 DR 阳极滤过器 信噪比 吸收剂量 品质因数 digital mammography anode/filter combination signal to noise ratio mean glandular dose figure of merit
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Van Ongeval C, Bosmans H, Van Steen A, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial[J]. Eur Radiol,2006,16:1360-1366.
  • 2Saunders RS, Samei E, Jesneck JL, et al. Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector [J].Med Phys,2005,32:588-599.
  • 3Doyle P, Martin CJ, Gentle D. Application of contrast-to-noise ration in optimizing beam quality for digital chest radiography: comparison of experimental measurements and theoretical simulations[J]. Phys Med Biol,2006, 51:2953-2970.
  • 4Gingold EL, Xizeng W, Barnes GT. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography[J]. Radiology,1995,195:639-644.
  • 5Dance DR, Thilander Klang A, Sandborg M, et al. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study[J]. BrJ Radiol,2000,73:1056-1067.
  • 6Fahfig R,Rowlands JA,Yaffe MJ.X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium:Optimal spectra for digital mammography[J].Med Phys,1996,23:557-567.
  • 7Young KC. Breast dose surveys in the NHSBSP: software and instruction manual,Version 2.0[M].NHSBSP Report 04/05, Guild ford,2004.
  • 8Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, et al. Additional factors for estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol[J]. Phys Med Biol,2000, 45:3225-3240.
  • 9Perry N,Broeders M,de Wolf C,et al.European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis,4th edition[M]. European Communities,2006,Luxembourg: chapter 2.
  • 10Toroi P,Zanca F,Young KC,et al.Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system[J]. Eur Radiol,2007,17:236B-2375.

二级参考文献12

  • 1白玫,彭明辰.X线CT成像质量评估中的调制传递函数的测试与分析[J].医疗设备信息,2006,21(5):11-13. 被引量:15
  • 2GB18871-2002电离辐射防护与辐射源安全基本标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003:37.
  • 3Van Ongeval C,Bosmans H,Van Steen A,et al.Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography:results of a prospective clinical trial[J].Eur Radiol, 2006,16:1360-1366.
  • 4Young KC,Cook JJH,Oduko JM.Use of the European Protocol to Optimise a Digital Mammography System[C]. In:Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Digital Mammography,2006:362-369.
  • 5Uchiyama N, Moriyama N, Kitagawa M. Clinical Optimization of Filters in Direct a-Se FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammog- raphy) System[J]. IWDM 2006, LNCS4046,315-323,2006.
  • 6Saunders RS,Samei E,Jesneck JL,et al.Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector[J].Med Phys,2005,32:588-599.
  • 7Young KC.Breast dose surveys in the NHSBSP:software and instruction manual, Version 2.0[M]. NHSBSP Report 04/05, Guildford,2004.
  • 8Dance DR,Skinner CL,Young KC,et al.Additional factors for estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol[J].Phys Med Biol 2000,45: 3225-3240.
  • 9Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis,4th edition[M].European Communities 2006,Luxembourg: chapter2.
  • 10Toroi P,Zanca F,Young KC,et al.Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system[J].Eur Radiol 2007,17:2368-2375.

共引文献3

同被引文献18

  • 1Gershon-Cohen J. Breast roentgenology. Am J Roentqenol Radium Ther Nucl Med, 1961, 86:879-883.
  • 2Gershon-Cohen J, Hermel MB, Birsner JW. Advances in mammographic technique. Am J Roentqenol Radium Ther NuclMed, 1970, 108:424-427.
  • 3Van Ongeval C, Bosmans H, Van Steen A, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography : results of a prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16:1360-1366.
  • 4Doyle P, Martin C J, Gentle D. Appfication of contrast-to-noise ration in optimizing beam quality for digital chest radiography: comparison of experimental measurements and theoretical simulatiov Phvs Med Biol. 2006, 51:2953-2970.
  • 5Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, et al. The essential physics of medical imaging. Philadilphia : Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002 : 38-230.
  • 6Heyes GJ, Mill A J, Charles MW. Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses. J Radiol Prot, 2009, 29:A123-A132.
  • 7Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography : an overview. Radiographics, 2004, 24 : 1747 -1760.
  • 8Haus AG. Metz CE, Chiles JT. et al. The effect of X-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography. Radiology, 1976, 118:705-709.
  • 9Spahn M. Flat detectors and their clinical applications. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15 : 1934-1947.
  • 10Gingold EL, Xizeng W, Barnes GT. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography. Radiology, 1995, 195:639-644.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部