摘要
【目的】探讨西酞普兰合用喹硫平治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效和安全性。【方法】将符合《中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准》第三版(CCMD-3)抑郁症诊断标准的82例门诊及住院患者随机分为两组,研究组(n=42)给予西酞普兰合用喹硫平治疗,对照组(n=40)给予西酞普兰治疗,疗程12周,于治疗前和治疗后2、4、6、8、12周分别使用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、临床疗效总评量表的病情严重程度(CGI-SI)和不良反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。【结果】治疗前研究组和对照组HAMD评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗12周后,研究组和对照组的HAMD评分均低于治疗前(P〈0.05);研究组6、8、12周HAMD评分均低于对照组(P〈0.05);研究组有效率高于对照组(73.8%VS47.5%,P〈0.01);治疗12周后两组CGI-SI评分比治疗前显著下降(P〈0.01,P〈0.05),治疗组下降幅度较对照组更为显著(P〈0.05)。两组间不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(78.5%vs75%,P〉0.05)。【结论】西酞普兰合用喹硫平治疗难治性抑郁症疗效较好,安全性高。
[Objective] To explore the efficacy and safety of citalopram combined with quetiapine in the treatment of refractory depression. [Methods]Eighty-two inpatients and outpatients who met the CCMD-3 diagnostic criteria for depression were randomly divided into two groups. The research group( n=42) received citalopram combined with quetiapine and the control group( n = 40) received citalopram for 12 weeks. Clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were assessed with the Hanmilton depression scale(HAMD), clinical global impression scale(CGI-SD and treatment emergent symptom scale(TESS) before treatment and at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment. [Results] Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the scores of HAMD between the two groups ( P〉0.05). At 12 weeks after treatment, the scores of the HAMD in both groups were lower than those before treatment( P〈0.05). At 6, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment, the scores of the HAMD in the research group were lower than those in the control group ( P〈0.05). The effective rate of the research group was higher than that of the control group(73.8% vs 47.5%, P d0. 01). At 12 weeks after treatment, the scores of CGI-SI in both groups were lower than those before the treatment(P〈0.01, P〈0.05). There were significant differences in the scores of CGI-SI between two groups after treatment( P〈0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(78.5% vs 750/00, P〉0.05). [Conclusion]Citalopram combined with quetiapine in the treatment of refractory depression has better efficacy and higher safety.
出处
《医学临床研究》
CAS
2011年第6期1063-1065,共3页
Journal of Clinical Research