期刊文献+

腹腔镜及开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆囊炎的对比分析

Comparative analysis of cholecystitis treated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术治疗胆囊炎的疗效及并发症。方法:将2010年1月-2011年3月收治的80例患者作为研究对象,随机分成腹腔镜胆囊切除术组和开腹胆囊切除术组,两组各40例,观察两组术后恢复情况及并发症。结果:开腹组术后疼痛时间长于腹腔镜组(P〈0.05),开腹组术后肛门排气明显晚于腹腔镜组(P〈0.05),开腹组术后下床活动时间明显晚于腹腔镜组(P〈0.05),开腹组术后感染等并发症的发生率明显高于腹腔镜组(P〈O.05)。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术比开腹胆囊切除术创伤小、疗效高、并发症少、疼痛轻、恢复快,且对患者的免疫功能影响较小,腹腔镜胆囊切除术的综合优势较明显,适用于临床推广使用。 Objective:To compare the laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open choleeystectomy cholecystitis treatment efficacy and complications. Methods:80 patients from January 2010 to March 2011 were treated as research subjects,were divided into laparoscopic eholeeystectomy group and open cholecystectomy group, 40 patients in every group,and the postoperative recovery and complications were observed. Results.. Postoperative pain of laparotomy group longer than the laparoscopic group of (P〈0.05), anal exhaust of laparotomy group was significantly later than the laparoseopic group (P〈0.05) ,laparotomy group were out of bed time was significantly later than the laparoscopic group (P〈0.05) ,postoperative infection and other complications of laparotomy group were significantly higher than the laparoscopic group (P〈0.05). Conclnsion:Laparoscopic cholecystectomy than open cholecystectomy trauma, high efficacy, fewer complications,less pain, faster recovery,and the impact on immune function in patients with small,laparoscopic cholecystectomy the comprehensive advantages of the more obvious,for clinical use.
出处 《按摩与康复医学》 2011年第20期71-72,共2页 Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 开腹胆囊切除术 胆囊炎 疗效 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Open cholecystectomy Cholecystitis Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献11

  • 1樊庆洋,赵强,郭涛,陈亮.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜切除术式选择[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2005,10(1):53-55. 被引量:18
  • 2郭定炯,龚迪和,洪德飞.腹腔镜胆囊切除术在急性胆囊炎中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(4):288-289. 被引量:72
  • 3陈伟.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术治疗的体会[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(08S):52-52. 被引量:17
  • 4王羽,刘小东.B型超声在腹腔镜胆囊切除术前评估中的价值[J].腹部外科,2007,20(4):236-237. 被引量:3
  • 5刘永雄,中国肝胆外科杂志,1998年,4卷,1期,65页
  • 6Yuichi Yamashita,Tadahiro Takada,Yoshifumi Kawarada,Yuji Nimura,Masahiko Hirota,Fumihiko Miura,Toshihiko Mayumi,Masahiro Yoshida,Steven Strasberg,Henry A. Pitt,Eduardo de Santibanes,Jacques Belghiti,Markus W. Büchler,Dirk J. Gouma,Sheung-Tat Fan,Serafin C. Hilvano,Joseph W.Y. Lau,Sun-Whe Kim,Giulio Belli,John A. Windsor,Kui-Hin Liau,Vibul Sachakul. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines[J] 2007,Journal of Hepato - Biliary - Pancreatic Surgery(1):91~97
  • 7K. Singh,A. Ohri. Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J] 2006,Surgical Endoscopy(11):1754~1758
  • 8M. P. Callery. Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations[J] 2006,Surgical Endoscopy(11):1654~1658
  • 9Takeyuki Misawa,Ryota Saito,Hiroaki Shiba,Kyonsu Son,Yasuro Futagawa,Takuya Nojiri,Kumiko Kitajima,Tadashi Uwagawa,Yuichi Ishida,Yuji Ishii,Katsuhiko Yanaga. Analysis of bile duct injuries (Stewart-Way classification) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J] 2006,Journal of Hepato - Biliary - Pancreatic Surgery(5):427~434
  • 10崔勇,张勇,熊裕雄.腹腔镜、开腹胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎疗效比较[J].山东医药,2008,48(3):102-103. 被引量:24

共引文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部