期刊文献+

宫颈电环切除术在宫颈上皮内瘤样变诊治中的价值

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈电环切除术(LEEP)对宫颈上皮内瘤样变(CIN)的诊治价值。方法回顾分析2007年7月至2010年7月经广州市海珠区妇幼保健院阴道镜病理活检诊断的178例CIN行LEEP的手术、病理及随访资料。结果 LEEP手术时间(3±2)min,术中出血平均为(10±5)mL。术后阴道出血1.69%(3/178)例。LEEP术前后CIN病理诊断符合率69.10%(123/178),升级9.55%(17/178),),其中1.69%(3/178)例升级为浸润癌,降级21.34%(38/178)。随访6个月~3年,平均25.3个月。CIN的治愈率为96.07%(171/178),病变持续存在3.93%(7/178),复发率5.62%(10/178)。结论 LEEP操作简单且较安全、治愈率高、并发症少,但术后有复发和残留的风险,需要长期随访,尤对已CINⅡ/Ⅲ更应加强监测。
作者 胡淑霞 梅丽
出处 《中国医药指南》 2011年第19期72-73,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Grce M,Matovina M,Milutin-Gasperov N,et al.Advances in cervical cancer control and future perspectives[J]. Coil Antropol,2010,34(2): 731-736.
  • 2Melnikow J,Kulasingam S,Slee C,et al.SurveiUance after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: outcomes,costs,and cost- effectiveness[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116(5): 1158-1170.
  • 3Emam M,Elnashar A,Shalan H,et al.Evaluation of a single-step diagnosis and treatment of premalignant cervical lesion by LEEP[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2009,107(3): 224-227.
  • 4于琴.LEEP环切电刀治疗宫颈疾病660例的临床分析[J].临床军医杂志,2009,37(5):839-840. 被引量:15
  • 5杨越波,沈慧敏,颜颖,叶青剑.高频电波刀电圈切除术在宫颈疾病诊治中的价值[J].中国妇幼保健,2008,23(21):3043-3045. 被引量:12
  • 6Baloglu A,Uysal D,Bezircioglu I,et al.Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions[JJ. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2010,282(1):69-73.
  • 7Kang WD,Oh MJ,Kim SM,et al.Significance of human papilloma- virus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepitheUal neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2010,203(1):72.
  • 8Jeong NH,Lee NW, Kim HJ, et al.High-risk human papillomavirus testing for monitoring patients treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2009,35(4): 706-711.

二级参考文献14

  • 1毕蕙,廉玉茹,李克敏.CINⅡ~ⅢLEEP治疗后随访情况分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(1):37-39. 被引量:97
  • 2曾镜源,陆尧胜,沈以鸿.LEEP刀系统的研制[J].医疗卫生装备,2007,28(2):30-32. 被引量:3
  • 3李晓兰.宫颈癌发病年轻化趋势分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(23):3206-3207. 被引量:36
  • 4HilleMnns P, Kimmig R, Dannecker C et al. LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neopllasias. Zentralbl Gtnakol, 2000, 122 (1) : 35
  • 5Mathevet P, Chemall E, Roy M et al. Long - term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of cognization : cold knife, laser, and LEEP1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Rep rod Biol, 2003, 10, 106 (2) : 214 -218
  • 6Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure : a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 102 (5Pt1) : 1058 - 1062
  • 7Paraskevaidis E, Koliopoulos G, Lolis E et al. Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure formicroinvasive (FICa) stage IA1) cervical cancerl. Gynecol Oncol, 2002, 86 (1) : 10 -13
  • 8Althuisius SM, Sehornagel IJ, Dekker GA et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the cervix and time of delivery in subsequent pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2001, 72 (1) : 31 -34
  • 9张玉勤,杨彗娟,盛伟琪,王华英,任玉兰.宫颈上皮内瘤变315例手术前后病理分析[J].中国癌症杂志,2008,18(1):51-54. 被引量:22
  • 10史雪鸿.子宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)临床及病理分析[J].现代保健(医学创新研究),2008,5(15):177-178. 被引量:4

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部