期刊文献+

不同课程水平英语学习者词汇复杂性研究 被引量:27

The Effects of School Type and Writing Proficiency on EFL Learners' Lexical Complexity Across Course Program Levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究依据课程水平调查学校类型和作文水平对英语学习者词汇复杂性的影响。词汇复杂性分为表层和深层两个维度。多元方差分析发现,不论在何种课程水平中,学校类型和作文水平在词汇复杂性层面均没有交互作用。它们在同一课程水平中不同时发挥作用,且只影响表层词汇复杂性,对深层词汇复杂性没有影响。词汇复杂性不同层面的发展存在竞争关系和补偿效应。 This article investigates the effects of school type and writing proficiency on EFL learners' lexical complexity across course program levels.Lexical complexity is categorized into surface and deep types.The former is measured by lexical sophistication and lexical diversity,whereas the latter by semantic co-referentiality and hyponymy.As multivariate ANOVAs indicate,there is no interaction between school type and writing proficiency on lexical complexity regardless of course program level,and they do not influence lexical complexity simultaneously within each course program level.They exert their effects on surface lexical complexity,but not on deep lexical complexity.Besides,competing relationships and compensatory effects are found to exist between surface and deep lexical complexity.
作者 鲍贵
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期55-60,127-128,共6页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(09YJAZH044) 江苏省社会科学基金项目(09YYB010) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(09SJB740009) 江苏省高校"青蓝工程"(苏教师〔2010〕27号)
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1鲍贵.二语学习者作文词汇丰富性发展多纬度研究[J].外语电化教学,2008(5):38-44. 被引量:84
  • 2鲍贵.英语学习者语言复杂性变化对比研究[J].现代外语,2010,33(2):166-176. 被引量:74
  • 3刘东虹.词汇量在英语写作中的作用[J].现代外语,2003,26(2):180-187. 被引量:81
  • 4Arthttr, B. Short-term changes in EFL composition skills [C] // C. Yorio, K. Perkins & J. Schachter. On TESOL'79: The Learner in Focus. Washington, D. C. : TESOL, 1979: 330 - 342.
  • 5Baba, K. Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summa- ries in a foreign language [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2009, 18:191-208.
  • 6Crossley, S. & D. McNamara. Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing [ J ]. Journal of Se- cond Language Writing, 2009, 18 : 119 - 135.
  • 7Crossley, S. , T. Salsbury & D. McNamara. Measuring L2 lexical growth using hypemymic relationships [ J ]. Lan- guage Learning, 2009, 59 (2) : 307 -334.
  • 8Durstn, P. , D. Malvem, B. Richards & N. Chipere. Deve- lopmental trends in lexical diversity [ J ]. Applied Linguis- tics, 2004, 25 (2) : 220 - 242.
  • 9Engber, C.A. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of L2 compositions [ J]. Journal of Second LanguageWriting, 1995, 4:139-155.
  • 10Graesser, A. , D. McNamara, M. Louwerse & Z. Cai. Coh- Metrix : Analysis of text on cohesion and language [ J ]. Be- havior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 2004, 36 (2): 193-202.

二级参考文献68

共引文献207

同被引文献291

引证文献27

二级引证文献179

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部