期刊文献+

微创TLIF术治疗腰椎退行性疾病40例疗效观察 被引量:4

Effect of minimally invasive TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨微创经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的方法及疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2006年7月至2010年1月微创TLIF治疗腰椎间盘突出症40例(微创TLIF组、观察组)随访资料完整的病例,并与同期采用常规开放PLIF治疗的40例患者(常规PLIF组、对照组)进行比较。统计两组手术时间、术中出血量、输血量、术后引流量、VAS评分、ODI评分改善率及术中、术后并发症情况。结果两组患者均获随访12~30个月,平均20个月。微创TLIF组平均手术时间、平均术中出血量、平均输血量、术后平均引流量、VAS评分、ODI评分改善率及术中、术后并发症情况与常规PLIF组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微创TLIF术治疗腰椎退行性疾病比常规开放PLIF术手术时间短,术中出血量、输血量、术后平均引流量少,临床症状体征改善率高及术中、术后并发症少,适合临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the application and effect of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Methods The medical records of 40 patients undergoing minimally invasive TLIF for lumbar disc herniation in our hospital from July 2006 to January 2010 were retrospectively analyzed(minimally invasive TLIF group,the study group) . The data of the study group was compared with that of 40 patients receiving conventional open PLIF(conventional open PLIF group,the control group) ,regarding the operation time,blood loss,blood transfusion,postoperative drainage,VAS and ODI score improvement rate,as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results The two groups of patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months,with an average of 20 months. Results revealed that all the data investigated in the study group showed statistically significant difference with that from the control group(P0.05) . Conclusion Compared with the conventional open PLIF,minimally invasive TLIF has the advantages of shorter operation time,less blood loss,decreased blood transfusion,reduced average postoperative drainage,higher improvement rate of clinical symptoms and signs,as well as less intraoperative and postoperative complications. Therefore,it should be applied and extended clinically.
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2011年第14期37-39,共3页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 微创 TLIF术 腰椎退行性疾病 椎体间融合 Minimally invasive Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) Lumbar degenerative disease Interbody fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Rosonberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transfuraminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results[J]. Neurosurgery, 2001, 8: 569-575.
  • 2Kettler A, Schmoelz W, Kast E, et al. In vitro stabilizing effect of transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages[J]. Spine, 2005, 30: 665-670.
  • 3Sehwender JD, HolIyLT, RoubenDP, et al. Minimally invasive transfo-raminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and ini-tial results[J]. J Spinal Dissord Tech, 2005, 18: 1-6.
  • 4Kim DY, Lee SH, Chtmg SK, et al. Comparison ofrnultifidusmuscle atrophy and trunk extensionmuscle strength: percutaneousversus open pedicle screw fixation[J]. Spine, 2005, 30 (1): 123-129.
  • 5Taylor J, Pupin P, Delajoux S, et al. Device for intervertebml assisted motion: technique and initial results[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2007, 22(1): 7-10.
  • 6Ozgur BM, Hughes SA, Baird LC, et al. Minimally disruptivede- compression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine J, 2006, 6(1): 27-33.
  • 7Steinmetz MP, Resnick DK.Use of a ventral cervical retractor system forminmi alaccess transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: tech-nical case report [J]. Neurosurgery, 2007, 60(2Suppll): 175-176.

同被引文献44

  • 1朱立国,于杰,高景华,张清,李俊杰,方建国.旋转手法治疗神经根型颈椎病对疼痛的VAS评分临床研究[J].北京中医,2005,24(5):297-298. 被引量:66
  • 2沈忆新,郑祖根,成茂华,董启榕,周晓中.极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的诊治分析[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(8):559-561. 被引量:26
  • 3范顺武,方向前,赵兴,赵凤东,虞和君.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):81-85. 被引量:54
  • 4周跃,王健,初同伟,李长青,张正丰,王卫东,郑文杰.极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的微创外科治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(4):241-247. 被引量:72
  • 5赵广民,李放,孙天胜,吴军,关凯,单建林,张志成.极外侧腰椎间盘突出症的分型治疗[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(10):796-798. 被引量:10
  • 6Crandall DG, Berven SH, Anand N, et al. An expandable crescent shaped TLIF cage to improve segmental lordosis:radiograph analysis, safety, efficacy and early clinical outcomes [ J ]. Spine, 2013,9 : 113 -114.
  • 7Adogwa O, Thompson P, Veda T, et al. 154 outcomes after ALIF vs TLIF for treatment of symtomatic L5 S1 spondylolisthesis: a prospec- tive, multi - institutional comparative effectiveness study [ J ]. Neuro- surgery, 2013,60 : 171 - 171.
  • 8Steinmetz MP, Resnick DK. Use of a ventral cervical retractor sys - tem for minimal access transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: tech - nical case report [ J ]. Neurosurgery,2007,2:175 - 176.
  • 9Schmid R, Lindtner RA, Lill M, et al. Combined posteroanterior fu- sion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in thora- columbar burst fractures [ J ]. Injury, 2012,4:475 - 479.
  • 10Kettler A, Schmoelz W, Kast E, et al. In vitro stabilizing effect of transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages[ J]. Spine ,2005,30:665 - 670.

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部