期刊文献+

论职业协会惩戒权的公法规制 被引量:1

On the Public Law Regulation of Punishment Power of Professional Association
下载PDF
导出
摘要 依法律保留原则,职业协会惩戒规则可创设的惩戒种类应分三种情况:"加强型"的法律保留、"框架性"法律保留以及无需法律保留可自行创设的惩戒种类。职业协会惩戒权运行时应当遵循正当程序,具体包括无偏私规则和公平听证权。以履行"公共治理职能"为标准,职业协会惩戒行为具有可诉性,应将"穷尽协会内部救济"作为司法审查的前置程序,另外,在惩戒规则的解释、案件事实的认定、不确定法律概念方面注意司法审查的强度,以平衡司法权与协会自治权的关系。 According to the principle of law-preserving,the punishment kinds which created by the disciplinary principle of Professional Association can be divided into three circumstances: the "reinforced" law-preserving,"structural" law-preserving and the punishment kinds which can be created by itself without needing law-preserving.The punishment power of professional association shall operates in accordance with due process which includes no bias deciders rules and fair hearing right to perform "the functions of public administration" as the standard,punishment actions of professional associations has a characteristics of justiciability,should "end the internal remedy of association" the preceding procedure of judicial review,in addition,in terms of the explaination of the punishment rules,the fact-finding of the case,uncertain legal concept,in order to balance the relationship between judicial power and autonomy of association,the punishment power of professional association should pay attention to the intensity of judicial review.
作者 谭九生
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期89-93,共5页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 湖南省高校科研重点项目"社会自治组织处罚权的公法规制论"(10A125)阶段性成果
关键词 职业协会 惩戒权 公法规制 professional association punishment power public law regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[英]丹宁勋爵 杨百揆 刘庸安 丁健译.法律的训诫[M].北京:法律出版社,1999..
  • 2[德].哈特穆特·毛雷尔.行政法学总论[M].高家伟,泽.北京:法律出版社.2000.
  • 3[德].伯恩·魏德士.法理学[M].丁小春,等译.北京:法律出版社.2003.
  • 4[德].汉斯·J·沃尔夫,奥托·巴霍夫,罗尔夫·施托贝尔.行政法(第三卷)[M].高家伟,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.
  • 5韩勇.体育纪律处罚的正当程序研究[J].首都体育学院学报,2006,18(1):69-71. 被引量:3
  • 6[美]伯纳德·施瓦茨 徐炳 译.行政法[M].北京:群众出版社,1986..
  • 7[英].彼得·莱兰,戈登·安东尼.英国行政法教科书[M].杨伟东,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
  • 8[美]贝勒斯.程序正义--向个人的分配[M].邓海平,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
  • 9袁曙宏,苏西刚.论社团罚[J].法学研究,2003,25(5):58-70. 被引量:67
  • 10Development in the Law - Judicial Control of Actions of Private Associations, Harvant Law Beview March, 1963, Har. L. Bev. 1069.

二级参考文献21

  • 1季卫东.法律程序的意义——对中国法制建设的另一种思考[J].中国社会科学,1993(1):83-103. 被引量:741
  • 2吕予锋.什么是体育——一个适合进行法律分析的体育行为定义[J].天津体育学院学报,2005,20(3):10-12. 被引量:29
  • 3[英]霍布豪斯.《自由主义》[M].商务印书馆,1996年.第44-114页.
  • 4[美]戈尔丁.法律哲学[M]:中译本[M].北京:三联书店,1987.240-241.
  • 5陈光中.诉讼法专论[C].中国诉讼法学研究会内部资料,1998.348-349.
  • 6(1984)2 SALR 35(W)
  • 7Kenneth Culp Davis.Administrative Law Text[M].3rd edition.West Publishing Company 1972,p.245.See also Martin H.Redish and Lawrence C.Marshall.Adjudicatory Independence and the Value of Procedural Due Process[J].95 Yale Law Journal,1986:492
  • 8Revie v.Football Association[N ].The Times,14 December1979
  • 9S.A.De Smith.Judicial Review of Administrative Action[M].4th edition.London:Stevens and Sons,1980:196
  • 10Geoffrey A.Flick.Natural Justice:Principles and Practical Application[M].2nd edition.Sydney:Butterworths,1984:51

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部