期刊文献+

二维超声宫腔声学造影诊断子宫内膜息肉的价值 被引量:1

The clinical value of two-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography in diagnosis for endometrial polyps
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨二维超声宫腔声学造影(2D-SIS)对子宫内膜息肉的诊断价值。方法对临床拟诊内膜息肉的67例患者进行2D-TVS、2D-SIS及宫腔镜手术-病理检查,并对结果进行分析。结果以手术-病理结果作为诊断金标准,内膜息肉42例,粘膜下肌瘤8例,内膜增生9例,机化血凝块3例,正常内膜5例。2D-TVS对内膜息肉诊断的敏感性为81.0%,特异性68.0%,准确性76.1%;2D-SIS对内膜息肉诊断的敏感性为90.5%,特异性88.0%,准确性89.6%。造影前、后诊断准确率比较有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论 2D-SIS检查准确率高,是诊断子宫内膜息肉的可靠方法。 Objective To explore the clinical value of two-dimensional saline infusionsonohysterography(2D-SIS) in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. Methods 67 patients suspected of having endometrial polyps were enrolled in this study.Surgical-pathologic examination were performed after 2D-TVS and 2D-SIS examination in all cases.The inspection results were analyzed.Results Surgical-pathologic results as a diagnostic gold standard,there were 42 cases of endometrial polyps;8 cases of submucous myom;9 cases of endometrial hyperplasia;3 cases of intrauterine blood clots;5 cases of normal endometrium.The sensitivity of 2D-TVS was 81.0%,the specificity was 68.0%,the accuracy was 76.1%.The sensitivity of 2D-SIS was 90.5%,the specificity is 88.0%,the accuracy was 89.6%.Analysis of those findings indicated that there was significant difference(P0.05) between the two methods.Conclusions 2D-SIS inspection with high accuracy,is a reliable diagnostic method of endometrial polyps.
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2011年第10期1554-1555,共2页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 二维超声 宫腔造影 子宫内膜息肉 Two-dimensional ultrasound Hysterography Endometrial polyps
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1邓凤平,袁帆,王洁婷,徐利云,黄国诚,宋素云.经阴道超声对子宫内膜息肉的诊断价值[J].实用医技杂志,2006,13(9):1434-1436. 被引量:6
  • 2付丽娟,吴玮,郭桦.经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断子宫内膜病变的临床价值[J].实用临床医学(江西),2006,7(6):127-129. 被引量:13
  • 3徐勇,蔡爱露,杨泽宇,陈雁威,任玉兰,杨清.宫腔声学造影与经阴道超声诊断子宫内膜息肉的ROC曲线分析[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2006,17(8):455-457. 被引量:6
  • 4Laifer-Narin S, Ragarendra N, Parmenter EK, et al. Falsemormal appearance of the endometrium on conventional transvaginal Sonography:comparison whith saline hysterosonography[J]. AJR, 2002, 198(1) : 129-133.
  • 5Baldwin MR,Dudick KM,Corman B,et al. Focal intracavitary masses recoginized with the hyperechoic line sign at endovaginal US and characterized with hysterosonography [J].Radicgraphics, 1999,19 : 927-935.
  • 6Martinez-Perez O,Perez-Medina T,Bajo-Arenas J. Ultrasonography of endometrial polyps[J]. Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gyneco, 1 2003, 3 : 43-50.
  • 7Pokharel HP, Bhatla N, Kriplani A, et al. Evaluation of endometrial changes and p53 expression in tamoxifen treated women: comparison of various methods[J]. Kathmandu Univ Med J(KUMJ), 2006, 4(2) :145-51.
  • 8Brosens JJ, Barker FG, De Souza NM. Myometrial zonal differentiation and uterine junctional zone hyperplasia in the nonpregnant uterus[J]. Hum Reprod update, 1998,4(5): 496 -502.
  • 9Laifer-Narin S, Ragavendra N, Parmenter EK, et al. Falsenormal appearance of the endometrium on conventional transvaginal sonography: comparison with saline hysterosonograpy[J]. AJR, 2002,178(1): 129-133.
  • 10Schwarzler P, Concin H, Bosch H, et al. An evaluation of sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the assessment of intrauterine pathology[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 11 (5):337-342.

共引文献36

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部