期刊文献+

房屋承租人与共有人的优先购买权冲突与协调 被引量:4

Conflict and Coordination between House Leaseholders and Co-owners' Preemptive Right
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《合同法》确认了房屋承租人的优先购买权,但承租人的这一权利经常与《物权法》规定的共有人的优先购买权发生冲突。要化解承租人与共有人的优先购买权冲突,不能局限于"物权优先于债权"的一般论证,更不能用"买卖不破租赁"实现对承租人优先购买权的功能替代,而应当从价值评判的角度进行分析。与单独所有相比较,共有这种形态并不是一种很有效率的产权安排方式,现代社会应当尽量创造机会减少财产共有形态的存在,而共有人的优先购买权恰恰具有简化乃至消灭共有关系的重要价值,所以,应当优先于承租人的优先购买权。 House leaseholders' preemptive right has been confirmed by Contract Law,but this right may often be in conflict with the preemptive right of co-owner which be impowered by Property Law.To resolve the conflict,we can't be limited to the proof of "property rights take precedence over creditors right",and the rule "sales cannot devastate lease" isn't the functional alternative of house leaseholders' preemptive right.Compared with individual ownership,co-ownership isn't a kind of efficient property right arrangement,so today's society should try to creat opportunities to reduce the presence of co-ownership.Co-owners' preemptive right may simplify even eliminate the co-ownership,so it should take precedence over house leaseholders' preemptive right.
作者 赵守江
出处 《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第4期127-132,共6页 Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 房屋租赁 承租人优先购买权 共有人优先购买权 权利冲突 lease house leaseholders' preemptive right co-owners' preemptive right right conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

  • 1张学文.优先购买权优先顺序新探[J].法学杂志,1999,20(3):40-41. 被引量:12
  • 2张驰.权利优先行使辨析[J].法学,1996(4):34-35. 被引量:15
  • 3[11]月旦六法全书(千禧年版)[M].台北:元照出版公司,1999.4-205.
  • 4谢在全.民法物权论(上册)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000..
  • 5谢哲胜.大陆物权法制的立法建议[A]..人大法律评论(第二辑)[C].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001..
  • 6.共有人优先承购权与基地承租人优先购买权之竞合[A].王泽鉴.民法学说与判例研究(第三册)[C].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998..
  • 7戴孟勇.物权的优先效力:反思与重构[A].崔建远.民法9人行(第1卷)[C].香港:金桥文化出版有限公司,2003..
  • 8周缘求.论共有人优先购买权与承租人优先购买权之竞合[J].华东政法学院学报,2003(1):59-63. 被引量:20

共引文献19

同被引文献25

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部