NTV观点引发的逻辑哲学问题——直陈条件句有真值吗?

A Logic Philosophy Problem Arising from NTV View: Do Indicative Conditionals Have Truth-value?

下载PDF

导出

摘要直陈条件句的前件、后件是可以单独断定真假的,但整个直陈条件句是否有真值,却是一个有争议的问题。如果把直陈条件句作真值函项的解释,则会出现一些违反人们直觉的怪论,为了消解这种怪论,有些学者提出了NTV观点,这种观点认为直陈条件句不是真值函项的,直陈条件句没有真值,这引发了一个重要的逻辑哲学问题,即直陈条件句有无真值的问题。 For indicative conditionals,the truth-value of antecedent and consequents is individually asserted,but the truth-value of indicative conditionals is a controversial issue.If we treat indicative conditionals as truth-functional,some paradoxes will arise.In order to interpret them,some scholars proposed the view of NTV,claiming that indicative conditionals have no truth condition and no truth-value.This view provokes an important logic philosophy problem,namely,whether indicative conditionals have truth-value.

作者胡怀亮

机构地区云南师范大学哲学系

出处《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期101-106,158-159,共6页 Zhejiang Social Sciences

基金国家社会科学基金"不完全信息博弈论的归纳概率逻辑基础"(08DZX048) 云南省教育厅一般项目"现代归纳逻辑的创新功能与研究应用"(2010Y045)的阶段性成果

关键词直陈条件句 NTV观点真值合理性 Indicative Conditionals,NTV View,Truth-value,Rationality

分类号 B812 [哲学宗教—逻辑学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Lewis, D. (1976) "Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities, "Philosophical Review, 85.
2Alan Hdjek(2001)"Probability, Logic, and Proba- bility Logic", in The Blackwell Companion to Logic, ed. Lou Goble, Blackwell.
3Harper, W. L. , Stalnaker, R. , and Pearce, G. (eds). (1981). Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance, and Time. Dordreeht: D. Reidel. 231. Jackson, F. (ed). (1991). Conditionals. Oxford.. Clarendon Press.
4Bradley, Richard (2000). A Preservation Condition for Conditionals. Analysis 60.
5Bennett, J. (2003). A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals, Oxford University Press.
6John P. Burgess. (2004). Reviewed Work(s) : A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals The Bulletin of Sym- bolic Logic, Vol. 10, No. 4.
7张清宁.《逻辑哲学九章》,江苏:江苏人民出版社,2004.
8Adams, E. W. (1998). A Prime of Probability Logic, CSLI, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
9Lewis, D. (1976) "Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities, "Philosophical Review, 85,305.
10Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. 21-56.

1胡怀亮.NTV观点引发的逻辑哲学问题——直陈条件句能嵌套吗?[J].逻辑学研究,2012,5(4):27-38.
2胡怀亮,任晓明.关于直陈条件句等价论题的哲学思考[J].重庆工学院学报（社会科学版）,2008,22(8):17-20.
3胡怀亮.NTV观点与实质蕴涵怪论[J].云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2013,45(5):91-95.
4胡怀亮.直陈条件句与“亚当斯论题”[J].重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）,2011,25(3):19-23.
5梁发芾.奢俭皆错-礼法之下的怪论[J].国学（吉林）,2015(2):57-57.
6吴坚.真值函项理论与怪论[J].重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）,2010,24(6):9-13.
7何宏祥.善待“怪论”[J].中国政协,2007(6):14-14.
8刘步青.相干逻辑的产生及评价[J].重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）,2013,27(9):84-87. 被引量：1
9赖晓鹏.从道义怪论看道义逻辑的角色定位[J].云南社会科学,2013(5):49-54.
10易中天.这样的“孔子”不离奇吗？[J].各界,2011(6):65-67.

浙江社会科学

2011年第7期

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...

NTV观点引发的逻辑哲学问题——直陈条件句有真值吗?

参考文献20

相关作者

相关机构

相关主题

浏览历史