3Satar B, Yetiser S, Ozkaptan Y. Impact of tumor size on hearing outcome and facial function with the middle fessa approach for acoustic neuroma: a meta - analytic study . Acta Otolaryngol,2003, 123(4) :499 - 505.
4Wiet RJ, Mamikoglu B, Odom L,et al. Long- term results d the first 500 cases of acoustic neuroma surgery . Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2001 , 124(6) :645 - 651.
5Arriaga MA, Chen DA . Facial function in hearing preservation acoustic neuroma surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001 , 127(5):543 - 546.
6Ho SY, Hudgens S, Wiet RJ. Comparison of postoperative facial nerve outcomes between translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches in matched - pair patients. Laryngoscope, 2003,113(11) :2014 - 2020.
7Mamikoglu B, EsquiveJ CR, Wiet RJ.Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid appoach in medium - sized tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2003 , 129(4):429- 431.
8Oghalai JS, Buxbaum JL, Pitts LH, et al. The effect of age on acoustic neuroma surgery outcomes. Otol Neurotol, 2003 ,24(3) :473 - 477.
9Utermark T, Kaempchen K, Hanemann CO. Pathological adhesion of primary human schwannoma cells is dependent on altered expression of integrins. Brain Pathol, 2003 ,13(3):352-363.
10Gormley WB, Sekhar LN, Wright DC, et al . Acoustic neuromas: results of current surgical management. Nemosmgery, 1997, 41(1):50-58.
