期刊文献+

四面六边框架用于窝崩体内防冲促淤试验研究 被引量:2

Experimental study on application of tetrahedron-like penetrating frames to siltation promotion and erosion control for dike pit-type slide
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以南京三江口窝崩后实测地形资料为基础,建立了窝崩的概化模型。在模型中的崩窝体内布置了不同间距的四面六边框架、窝内沿岸带(相当于原体地形-15 m等高线以上)也布置了不同间距的四面六边框架,以及四面六边框架与口门潜锁坝组合等方案的试验研究工作。通过研究,认为窝内四面六边框架布置间距与工程量之间存在着一个最佳关系,并对此进行了讨论,提出了最佳间距;进行了单独工程(窝内工程)和上述联合工程的效果比较试验。研究表明,联合工程的效果虽比单独工程的效果要好但有限。 Based on the actual measured topographic data of the dike pit-type slide occurred at Sanjiangkou in Nanjing, a gen- eralized model of dike pit-type slide is established herein. With this model, the experimental study is made with the schemes of arranging the tetrahedron-like penetrating frames with various spacing distances inside of the slide pit and along the zone of hank ( eorresportding to above - 15 m of the contour of the original topography) in the pit and the combination of the tetrahed- ron-like penetrating frames with the submerged closure dikes at the entrance. Through the study concerned, it is considered that an optimal relationship is there between both the spacing distance for arranging the frames and the relevant construction quantity; for which a discussion is made and then the optimal spacing distance is put forward. Moreover, a comparative experi- ment is also made on the effects from both the single project ( only arranging the frames inside of the slide pit) and the com- bined project mentioned above. The study shows that even though the effect from the combined project is better than that from the single, it is limited.
出处 《水利水电技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期92-97,共6页 Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering
关键词 岸坡防护 窝崩处理 四面六边框架 防冲促淤 南京三江口 bank protection treatment on dike pit-type slide tetrahedron-like penetrating frame siltation promotion and erosioncontrol Sanjiangkou in Nanjing
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1金腊华,石秀清,王南海.长江大堤窝崩机理与控制措施研究[J].泥沙研究,2001,26(1):38-43. 被引量:7
  • 2王延贵,匡尚富.河岸窝崩机理的探讨[J].泥沙研究,2006,31(3):27-34. 被引量:11
  • 3应强,张幸农,孙波.长江窝崩机理研究现状的述评[C]∥长江护岸工程(第六届)及堤防防渗工程技术经验交流会.长江重要堤防隐蔽工程建设管理局,长江科学院编.2004:84-91.
  • 4Torreyvh Ii, Dunbar J B, Peiersonrw. Progressive failure in sand deposits of the Mississippi River, field investigations, laboratory studies and analysis of the hypothesized failure mechism [ R ]. Corps of Engineerings, USA: Department of the Army Waterway Experi- ment Station, 1988.
  • 5Frydman S, Beasiley D H. Centrifugal modelling of riverbank failure [ J]. Journal of the Geoteehnieal Engineering Division, 1976, 102 (5) : 395-409.
  • 6孙梅秀,吴道文,李昌华.长江八卦洲洲关控制工程及江岸崩窝的试验研究[R].南京:南京水利科学研究院,1989.
  • 7陈引川,彭海鹰.长江下游大窝崩的发生及防护[C]//水利部长江水利委员会.长江中下游护岸工程论文集:第三集.武汉:长江水利水电科学研究院,1985:112-116.
  • 8张岱峰.从人民滩窝崩事件看长江窝崩的演变特性[R].镇江:镇江市水利学会,1996:25-28.
  • 9马海顺.长江六合圩大窝崩的原因分析与治理意见[J].安徽水利科技,1990(2):37-47. 被引量:3
  • 10夏细禾,路彩霞.河岸窝崩灾害与治理措施的研究[J].长江科学院院报,2001,18(6):11-14. 被引量:4

二级参考文献15

  • 1冷魁.长江下游窝崩形成条件及防护措施初步研究[J].水科学进展,1993,4(4):281-287. 被引量:17
  • 2金腊华,王南海,傅琼华.长江马湖堤崩岸形态及影响因素的初步分析[J].泥沙研究,1998,23(2):67-71. 被引量:21
  • 3Koppejan A W, Van Wanelen B M and Weinberg L J H, Coastal Flow Slides in the Dutch Province of Zeeland, Proc. 2nd ICOSMFE ,5. Rotterdam, 1948, p89 - 96.
  • 4丁普育,张敬玉.江岸土体液化与崩岸关系的探讨[A].长江中下游护岸工程论文集(3)[C].长江水利水电科学研究院,1985.104—109.
  • 5陈引川,彭海鹰.长江下游大窝崩的发生及防护[A].长江中下游护岸工程论文集(3)[C].长江水利水电科学研究院,1985.112—117.
  • 6王志昆.嘶马段崩岸变化及其原因分析[A].长江中下游护岸工程论文集(4)[C].水利部长江水利委员会,1990.303—307.
  • 7中科院地理所.长江九江至河口河床边界条件及其与崩岸的关系[A].长江中下游护岸工程经验选编,北京:科学出版社,1978.
  • 8Davis R J and Gregory K J. A New Distinct Mechanism of River Bank Erosion in A Forested Catchment. Journal of Hydrology,1994,No.157:1 - 11.
  • 9张应龙.荆江护岸工程近岸河床演变[A].长江中下游护岸工程论文集(3)[C].长江水利水电科学研究院,1985.97—104.
  • 10师哲.嘶马护岸工程稳定趋势的初步分析[A].长江中下游护岸工程论文集(4)[C].水利部长江水利委员会,1990.323—330.

共引文献21

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部