期刊文献+

知识产权冲突法的实证分析 被引量:1

Empirical Analysis of the Conflict of Laws of Intellectual Property
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在发达且频繁的国际经贸交往情形下,传统的知识产权跨国诉讼模式已经很难适应知识产权国际保护的新需要。变革传统制度的要求,就是扩大法院在涉外知识产权领域的管辖权。知识产权冲突法的实证还表现在一些内国法院纷纷适用外国的知识产权法。我国立法应区分知识产权案件与普通民商事案件的差别,除完善现有知识产权法律适用规则外,还应创制专门的涉外知识产权司法管辖规则。 Under the situation of so developed and so frequent international business and economics communication, traditional mode of transnational intellectual property litigation became difficult to adapt to the new needs of international protection of intellectual property. The reform of traditional system focuses mainly on the expansion of national fora' s jurisdiction over foreign-related intellectual property cases. The real evidence also finds expression in some national fora' s applying foreign intellectual property laws. The legislation of our country ought to perfect present law-applying lades to intellectual property and also create special rules tojurisdiction over foreign - related intellectual property cases.
作者 杨长海
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2011年第4期84-88,113,共6页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
基金 作者主持的教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目"知识产权冲突法若干前沿问题研究"(10YJA820122)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 知识产权 冲突法 管辖权 法律适用 intellectual property conflict of laws jurisdiction law application
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Marta Perteqas Sender. Cross - border Enforcement of Patent Rights: Analysis of the Interface between Intellectual Property and Private International Law[ M]. Oxford Universi- ty Press, 2002:1.
  • 2John R. Thomas. Litigation Beyond the Technologi- cal Frontior: Comparative Approaches to Multinational Patent Enforcement[ J ]. Law and Policy in International Business, 1996(2) : 299 - 305.
  • 3王雷.个案中对域外注册商标能否保护的法理研究.政法论坛,:18-18.
  • 4Graeme. W. Austin. Valuing "Domestic Self- Deter- mination" In International Intellectual Property Jurispru- dence, 77 CHI.-KENT L. REV;, 2002:1179.
  • 5Graeme B. Dinwcxxtie. Developing a Private Interna- tional Intellectual Property Law[ EB/OL]. http://www, law. northwestern, edu/colloquium/ip/dinwcxxtie, pdf, 2007 - 12 - 26.
  • 6曾陈明汝.智慧财产权之国际私法问题(三)--论事实行为发生之债既智财权国际侵害之准据法[M]//国际私法原理续集一冲突法论.台北:三民书局,1996:128-130.
  • 7Marta Perteqas Sender. Cross- border Enforcement of Patent Rights: Analysis of the Interface between Intellectual Property and Private International Law[ M]. Oxford. Oxford University Press, 2002 : 27.
  • 8Graeme. W. Austin. Valuing "Domestic Self- Deter- mination" In International Intellectual Property Jurispru- dence,77 CHI. -KENT L. REV., 2002:1179.
  • 9Toshiyuki Kono. Resolution Through Conflict of Laws: Intellectual Property Rights, Conflict of Laws and Inter- national Jurisdiction:Applicability of ALI Principles in Japan? [ J ]. 30 Brooklyn J. Int' 1L., 2005 : 877.
  • 10See Interlas v. Lincoln , Dutch Supreme Court HR 24 November 1989, BIE 1991.

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部