期刊文献+

教师教学计划决策现状的调查与分析 被引量:2

Investigation and Analysis on the Present Conditions of Teacher Planning Decision-making
原文传递
导出
摘要 教师教学计划决策是指教师在教学实施前所做出的一系列教学选择。本研究试图回答两个问题:教师在教学计划决策时所关注要素的内容和特点有哪些,以及教师在进行教学计划决策时的主要依据是什么。研究结果表明,在对象、内容、方法和评价这四个主要要素中,教师教学计划决策最关注的是教学内容,而对教学对象关注的目的是完成教学内容。教师教学决策的主要依据是教师知识、教师信念和实践经验,集中表现为教师的教学价值取向。 Teacher Planning Decision-making refers to making teaching decisions before the teaching process. This research tries to find the answers of the following two questions : firstly, what factors are paid attention to during the teacher planning decision-making; and secondly, on what do teachers rely when they do their planning decision-making. The result shows that teachers pay much more attention to the teaching content among the four factors: object, content, method and evalua- tion. When they make teaching planning decisions, teacher mainly rely on their teaching knowledge, teaching belief and practical wisdom.
作者 宋德云 李森
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期51-56,共6页 Teacher Education Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究"十一五"规划项目(09YJA880113)成果之一 重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究重点项目(10SKA01)相关成果
关键词 教师 教学计划决策 调查 分析 teacher teacher planning decision-making investigation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1宋德云,李森.教师的教学决策:内涵、构成及意义[J].课程.教材.教法,2008,28(12):21-26. 被引量:47
  • 2Blaxter L. Hughes C. & Tight M.. HOW TO RESEARCH [ M ]. Open University Press, 1996.60.
  • 3Habermas, T. , & Bluck, S. Getting a Life: The Develop- ment of the Life Story in Adolescence [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin, 2000, 126 : 748 - 769.
  • 4Peggy A. Ertmer & Timothy J. Newby. Behaviorism, Cog- nitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective [ J ]. Performance Im- provement Quarterly, 1993, 6(4) :50 -72.
  • 5Pajares M F. Teachers Beliefs and Educational Research: Clearing up a Messy Construct [ J ]. Review of Educational Research, 1992, 62 (3).
  • 6Breen M. P. & Littlejohn A. Classroom Decision -making [ M ]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2000.
  • 7Schwab J J. Teaching and Learning [ J ]. The Center Maga- zine 9, 1976, (6).
  • 8Wilen W. et al. Dynamics of Effective Secondary Teaching (6th ed. ) [ M]. Pearson Education, Inc, 2008.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Clark C M, Peterson P. Teachers Thought Processes[A]. In M C Wittroek (ed.). Handbook of Research on Teaching [C]. New York: Macmillan. 1986.
  • 2Hunter M. Knowing, Teaching, and Supervising [A]. In P Hosford (Ed.). Using What We Know about Teaching [C]. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1984. 189.
  • 3Westerman D. Expert and Novice Teacher Decision Making [J]. Journal of Teacher Education, 1991, 42 (4): 292--305.
  • 4Wilen W, et al. Dynamics of Effective Secondary Teaching (6th ed. ) [M]. Pearson Education, Inc, 2007.
  • 5Hunter M. Teaching Is Decision Making [J]. Education Leadership, 1979, 37 (1):62--64, 67.
  • 6Hirst P H. Educational Theory and Its Foundation Disciplines [M]. London; Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1983.
  • 7Shavelson R J. Review of Research on Teachers' Pedagogical Judgments, Plans, and Decisions [J].Elementary School Journal. 1983, 83 (4): 392-- 413.
  • 8Shulman L S. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of New Reform [J]. Harvard Educational Review, 1987, 57: 1222.
  • 9Schon D. The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think in Action [M]. NY:Basic Book, 1983. 13.
  • 10Morine-Dershimer. The Anatomy of Teacher Prediction [ J ]. Educational Research Quarterly, 1978--1979, 3 (4): 43--52.

共引文献46

同被引文献13

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部