摘要
目的结合临床实践经验,探讨新式剖宫产对产妇术后恢复的影响。方法选取2010年1月至2010年6月期间,怀集县人民医院剖宫产产妇180例为研究对象,采用对照研究,经患者知情同意,将其分为对照组(90例)与观察组(90例),两组患者的年龄、孕周、手术指征等差别无统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组为怀集县人民医院采用新式剖宫产术,而对照组为同期传统剖宫产式术,比较两组患者术后并发症情况以及手术相关指标,采用Microsoft Excel建立数据库,运用SPSS13.0统计软件进行统计分析。采用χ2检验,取P<0.05为差别有统计学意义。结果本次研究结果显示,新式剖宫产术(观察组)与传统术(对照组)患者发生盆腔粘连、子宫内膜异位,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组比较差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论新式剖宫产术,具有创伤小、手术时间短、切口愈合好、术后恢复快等优点,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To carry out the observation of caesarean section on maternal postoperative recovery with clinical practice experience.Methods Select 180 cases of cesarean section in Huaiji people;s hospital from January to June in 2010 for the study,the use of controlled study,the informed consent of patients,divided into control group(90 cases) and the observation group(90 cases) two groups of age,gestational age,indications for surgery,etc.There was no significant difference(P〈0.05),in the observation group in Huaiji people;s hospital by cesarean section,while the control group,cesarean section for the same type of traditional surgery,compared postoperative complications,and surgery-related indicators,the use of Microsoft Excel to establish a database,using SPSS 13.0 statistical software for statistical analysis.By χ2 test,taking P〈0.05 for the difference was statistically significant.Results The results showed that cesarean section(observation group) and conventional surgery(control group) in patients with pelvic adhesions,endometriosis,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05),comparison of relevant indicators.Difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion The cesarean section,which is with less trauma and shorter operative time,wound healing is good,rapid recovery,etc,and worthy of clinical application.
出处
《中国医药指南》
2011年第20期202-203,共2页
Guide of China Medicine
关键词
新式剖宫产
术后恢复
临床研究
Caesarean section
Postoperative recovery
Clinical study