期刊文献+

气象法律成本缺失的经济学分析——以气象探测的环境保护为视角

气象法律成本缺失的经济学分析——以气象探测的环境保护为视角
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从法经济学理论分析,"违法成本低"问题在立法上的体现,是法律责任的设定不合理,大大降低了违法者应当承担的"预期成本"。本文界定了气象违法成本,对气象法律责任立法缺失问题进行了分析,指出目前我国对气象违法责任主体的处罚偏轻。法律规范过于依赖行政处罚或民事赔偿,对刑事手段重视不够。刑事责任和行政责任主要体现了惩罚,而民事责任主要体现了补偿,不同的法律责任体现出不同的法律意图,对气象违法主体行为也会产生不同的威慑效果。只有将这三者有机结合,才能降低政府的监管成本,同时提高公众保护气象环境、遵守气象法的意识。而刑事责任的空缺使气象违法成本大大降低,不利于气候状况的监测和保护,这种局面必须改变。 In the sight of law-economics theory,low law cost reflects the unr easonable legal liability in legislation and greatly lower expected cost of thos e who break the law.This paper has defined the concept of the meteorological il legal cost,analyzed the deficiency of the meteorological legal responsibility l egislation and pointed out that at present the punishment on offenders who break the meteorological law is not severe in our country.Legal norms depend heavily on administrative penalty or civil indemnification,and pay inadequate attentio ns to criminal means.The difference between criminal responsibility and adminis trative responsibility mainly reflect punishment,and civil responsibility refle cts compensation.Different legal responsibility reflects different legal intent ion and shows different deterrent effect on those who break the meteorological l aw.Only if the three means are appropriately integrated,can it cut down monito r cost of the governments at the same time improve public consciousness of prese rving meteorological environment and observing Meteorological law.The absence o f criminal responsibility greatly reduces the meteorological illegal cost and ha rm climate monitoring and protection,which should must be changed.
作者 吴玲
机构地区 江西省气象局
出处 《企业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期184-186,共3页 Enterprise Economy
关键词 气象 违法成本 法律责任 法经济学 立法缺失 meteorology illegal cost law responsibility law-economics legisla tion absence
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1吕学都.气候变化国际政策发展动向和展望[J].环境保护,2007,35(06A):36-42. 被引量:7
  • 2[澳]艾德里安·J·布拉德布鲁克等主编.《能源法与可持续发展》,曹明德等译,法律出版社2005年版.
  • 3Energy Law and Sustainable Development 13 (Adrian J. Bradbrook and Richard L. Ottinger eds. , IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 47, 2003 ).
  • 4Energy Law and Sustainable Development 16 ( Adrian J. Bradbrook and Richard L. Ottinger eds. , IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 47, 2003 ).
  • 5Meinhard Doelle, From Hot Air to Action? Climate Change, Compliance and the Future of International Environmental Law, 2005 Thomson Canada Limited, p15.
  • 6IPCC (Intergovemmental Panel on Climate Change) :Third Assessment Report[ R]. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • 7Roger Williamson, Energy Efficiency, Energy Security, Renewable Energy: Taking forward the Gleneagles Dialogue and the G8st Petersburg Conclusions, December 2006, Wilton Park Paper, P23.
  • 8韩小妮.“中国在联合国大会上严辞拒绝过分减排指标”,www.wnsy.com/article/2007/1214/article-296.html.2007年12月26日.
  • 9徐以祥.气候保护和环境正义——气候保护的国际法律框架和发展中国家的参与模式[J].现代法学,2008,30(1):187-193. 被引量:10
  • 10翟勇.应对气候变化的理性思考[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,10(3):1-7. 被引量:10

共引文献297

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部