摘要
以最后报价谈判问题为实验材料,考察了混合动机冲突情境中决策权力和社会角色的影响。结果表明:(1)决策权力对决策者的决定有显著影响。拥有分配权的决策者倾向于采取竞争策略,拥有要求权的决策者倾向于采取平均分配策略,拥有否决权的决策者倾向于采取合作策略。(2)社会角色对决策者的决定有显著影响。与陌生人角色相比,担任好朋友角色的决策者决定得到的点数明显地更低。
This study used the ultimatum game as experimental material to explore the effect of decision-making power and social role on mixed-motive conflict decision making. The results indicated that decision-making power had significant effect on decision-makers' strategy. Decision-makers with distribution power tended to adopt competi- tive strategy, decision-makers with veto power tended to adopt even strategy, and decision-makers with claim power tended to adopt cooperative strategy. The social role had significant effect on decisions. In comparison with decision-makers on stranger role, the decision-makers on good friend role decided to get significantly less.
出处
《心理与行为研究》
CSSCI
2011年第2期115-119,146,共6页
Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金
江西师范大学心理学博士后流动站研究基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(08JC840007)
江西省教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题(07ZD015)的资助
关键词
混合动机冲突
最后报价谈判
决策权力
社会角色
Mixed-motive conflict, ultimatum negotiation, decision-making power, social role