1KOVECSES,Z and RADDAEN, G. Metonymy:Devel- oping a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics[J]. 1998(9). 37-77.
2NTEMEIER. "Straight from the heart-metonymic and metaphorical explorations" [C]//Antonio Barcelona. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads :A Cognitive Perspectives ,Berlin and New York:Mouton de Gruyter, 2000 : 195-213.
3PANTHER K,RADDAEN G.Metonymy in language and thought [M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 1999: 17-59.
4KCVECSES Z., SZAB6 P.Idioms : A viow from Cogni- tive Semantics [J].Applied Linguistics, 1996 (3): 326-355.
5HILPERT M.Keep an eye on the data: Metonymies and their pattems[C]//Stefanowitsch,Anatol and Gries,Stefan Th.Corpus-based approaches to Metaphor and metonymy .Berlin and New York, 2006.
6SINCLAIR J.Corpuz,Concordance,Collocation [M].Ox- ford: Oxford University Press, 1991 : 4.
3Davies, Mark. The 360 million word Corpus of Contemporary American English( 1990 - 2007 ) [ A ]. Unpublished manuscript. Paper presented at American Association for Corpus Linguistics,2008.
4Davies, Mark. (forthcoming)Relational databases as a robust architecture for the analysis of word frequency [ A ]. In AHRC ICT Methods Network: Expert Seminar on Linguistics: Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction [ C ], ed. Dawn Archer. Ashgate.
5Davies, Mark. Semantically-based queries with a joint BNC/ WordNet database [ A ]. In Corpus Linguistics twenty-five years on, ed. Roberta Facchinetti. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007 : 149 - 167.
6Davies, Mark. The advantage of using relational databases for large corpora: speed, advanced queries, and unlimited annotation [ J ]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2005,10.
7www. r - project, org/.
8Gnterradden,Klaus-michael Kpcke,Thomas Berg,etal.As-pects of Meaning Construction[]..2007
9PRINGS R,DIRVEN R.Metaphor and Metonymy in Compar-ison and ContrasT[]..2002
