剖宫产与阴道分娩后因症取环的比较分析

Cesarean section and vaginal delivery for patients to take part in a comparative analysis

目的比较剖宫产与阴道分娩二种分娩方式对采用宫内节育器避孕后,因症取环的时间及原因。方法对257例因症取环进行回顾性统计分析。结果二种分娩方式因症取环与育龄妇女的年龄、产次、放置环种类和出血、腹痛、环位异常的症状类别没有无统计学意义;剖宫产史者出现症状的时间明显早于阴道分娩者。结论对于有剖宫产史的疤痕子宫病例,不能单纯按常规方法探得的宫腔长度选择宫内节育器,以减少此类患者在上环早期即出现不适症状而取环的比率。

Objective Cesarean section compared with vaginal delivery on the use of two delivery methods of intrauterine contraceptive devices, the result of disease and the reasons for taking the time ring. Methods 257 patients from Central for retrospective statistical analysis. Results The two kinds of mode of delivery for women of childbearing age patients from Central and age, parity, place the ring type and bleeding, abdominal pain, type of ring bit unusual symptoms no no statistical significance; a history of cesarean delivery was significantly earlier time of onset of symptoms In vaginal delivery. Conclusion For cases of cesarean uterine scar on the history, not simply obtained by conventional methods cavity length of the probe selection IUD to reduce such patients appears in the ring early symptoms and the rate of intrauterine devices.