期刊文献+

基于梯形模糊数的地表灰尘重金属污染健康风险评价模型 被引量:38

Fuzzy assessment model for the health risk of heavy metals in urban dusts based on trapezoidal fuzzy numbers
原文传递
导出
摘要 将梯形模糊数引入环境健康风险评价领域,构建了城市地表灰尘重金属污染健康风险评价模糊模型,提出了健康风险等级判别方法和具有模糊化特征的风险等级判别标准.同时,选取重金属Zn、Pb、Cu、Cd和Cr为评价因子,将基于梯形模糊数的健康风险评价模型和风险等级识别方法应用于合肥市城区地表灰尘重金属污染的健康风险评价中.结果表明,地表灰尘中Cd和Cr的致癌风险均很低,期望值分别为1.49×10-9和2.75×10-7,低于美国环保署(USEPA)推荐值10-6;Cd和Cr致癌总风险对Ⅰ级风险的隶属度为0.927,因此属于极低风险水平.儿童的地表灰尘重金属非致癌总风险期望值为1.888,超过了安全阈值1.0,而成人的非致癌总风险期望值仅为0.278;儿童和成人健康风险的主要暴露途径都是手-口直接摄入. By denoting exposure factors as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers,fuzzy assessment models were developed to calculate exposure dose and characterize the health risk of heavy metals in urban dusts.In addition,a new classification model and assessment criteria with seven grades for cancer risk are put forward.As a case study,the models established above were employed for human health risk assessment of Zn,Pb,Cu,Cd and Cr in urban dusts from the city of Hefei.The results showed that the expected values of cancer risk for the carcinogenic metals Cd and Cr were 1.49×10-9 and 2.75×10-7,respectively,lower than the soil management standard of the US EPA(i.e.1.0×10-6).The GradeⅠtotal cancer risk for Cd and Cr reached 0.927,suggesting that the annual cancer risks were extremely low and could be neglected.The expected value of total non-cancer hazard of the five heavy metals for children reached 1.888 and exceeded the safety threshold value(i.e.1.0).But for adults,the expected value was just 0.278 and far below the threshold value of 1.0.In Hefei,the highest levels of risk for all the elements included in the study seem to be associated with the route of ingestion of dust particles.
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期1790-1798,共9页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 安徽省科技攻关计划重点项目(No.07010302165)~~
关键词 合肥 梯形模糊数 地表灰尘 重金属 健康风险评价 Hefei trapezoidal fuzzy number urban dust heavy metal health risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Acosta J A, Cano A F,Arocena J M, et aL 2009. Distribution of metals in soil particle size fractions and its implication to risk assessment of playground in Murcia City (Spain) [ J ]. Geoderma, 149 ( 1/2 ) : 101-109.
  • 2Aelion C M, Davis H T, McDermott S, et al. 2008. Metal concentrations in rural topsoil in South Carolina: potential for human health impact[ J]. Science of the Total Environment, 402 (2/3) : 149-156.
  • 3北京市环境保护局.2007.京环发[2007]8号场地环境评价导则[S].北京:北京市环境保护局.
  • 4常静,刘敏,李先华,林啸,王丽丽,高磊.上海地表灰尘重金属污染的健康风险评价[J].中国环境科学,2009,29(5):548-554. 被引量:170
  • 5Charleswortb S, Everett M, McCarthy R, et al. 2003. A comparative study of heavy metal concentration and distribution in deposited street dusts in a large and small urban areas: Birmingham and Coventry, West Midlands, UK [ J]. Environment International, 29 (5) : 563-573.
  • 6陈丽旋,曾锋,罗丹玲,崔昆燕.城市道路灰尘中邻苯二甲酸酯污染特征研究[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(3):409-413. 被引量:20
  • 7De Miguel E,Iribarren I, Chac6n E, et al. 2007. Risk-based evaluation of the exposure of children to trace elements in playgrounds in Madrid (Spain) [J]. Chemosphere, 66(3): 505-513.
  • 8丁昊天,袁兴中,曾光明,祝慧娜,梁婕,樊梦佳,江洪炜.基于模糊化的长株潭地区地下水重金属健康风险评价[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(11):1323-1328. 被引量:47
  • 9Dubois D, Prade H. 1987. The mean value of a fuzzy number [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24(3) : 279-300.
  • 10樊梦佳,袁兴中,祝慧娜,黄华军,曾光明,梁运姗,江洪炜.基于三角模糊数的河流沉积物中重金属污染评价模型[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(8):1700-1706. 被引量:29

二级参考文献258

共引文献797

同被引文献540

引证文献38

二级引证文献343

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部