期刊文献+

体外模拟CO_2气腹对人结肠癌SW480细胞生长的影响 被引量:2

Effects of Simulated CO_2 Pneumoperitoneum on the Growth of Human Colonic Cancer SW480 Cells
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过建立体外模拟CO2气腹环境,研究CO2气腹对人结肠癌SW480细胞生长的影响。方法建立体外模拟CO2气腹环境,在全自动气腹机作用下维持密闭培养箱内压力分别为9、12、15 mm Hg,持续时间分别为1、2、4 h。在处理后第12 h通过流式细胞仪观察细胞周期变化;在处理后第12、24、36、48、60、72 h用MTT法检测细胞增殖情况;在处理后0、0.5、1、1.5、2、2.5 h通过电子pH计检测细胞培养液pH值的变化。结果流式细胞仪检测细胞周期结果显示,CO2气腹组G0/G1期细胞比例与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CO2气腹压力对于人结肠癌G0/G1期细胞周期有显著影响(P=0.008),但对S期、G2/M期无影响(P>0.05);CO2气腹持续作用时间对各细胞周期无影响(P>0.05)。MTT法检测细胞增殖结果显示,各气腹组人结肠癌SW480细胞的D(490)值均低于对照组,且9 mm Hg-4 h、12 mm Hg-4 h、15 mm Hg-2 h气腹组在处理后第24、36 h,15 mm Hg-4 h气腹组在处理后第24、36、48、60 h的人结肠癌SW480细胞的D(490)值与对照组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。压力处理后第24、36 h对SW480细胞的增殖有显著的一过性影响(P<0.01),而在第12、48、60、72 h对SW480细胞的增殖无影响(P>0.05);作用时间对SW480细胞的增殖无影响(P>0.05)。电子pH计检测细胞培养液pH值结果显示,除9 mm Hg-1 h气腹组在处理后2.5 h细胞培养液的pH值与对照组无统计学差异外(P>0.05),其余各气腹组在处理后0、0.5、1、1.5、2、2.5 h与对照组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论体外模拟CO2气腹环境,不会促进结肠癌细胞的增殖,且高CO2气腹压力对结肠癌细胞的增殖有一过性抑制作用,CO2气腹持续时间对结肠癌细胞的增殖无影响。 Objective To study the effects of simulated CO2 pneumoperitoneum on the growth of cultured human colonic cancer SW480 cells. Methods Colonic cancer SW480 cells were exposed to CO2 environment for different time durations ( 1, 2 and 4 hours) under different pressures (9, 12 and 15 mm Hg), and the cells that cultured in normal experiment were set as a control group. The cell cycle were examined by flow cytometry after being moved to normal conditions for 12 h; and the proliferation of SW480 cells were examined by MTT after being moved to normal conditions for 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h respectively; and pH of the culture media was measured after being in normal condition for 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 h. Results The G0/G1 ratio showed no statistical difference between CO2 pneumoperitoneum and control groups (P 〉 0.05 ). CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure had significant influence on the numerical values of human colonic cancer cells in G0/G1 phase (P = 0. 008) , however no influence on the numerical values of the cells in S and G2/M phases(P 〉 0.05). The duration of exposure to simulated CO2 pneumoperitoneum had no significant influence on the cell cycle (P 〉 O. 05). MTT showed that the proliferative viability in CO2 group grew slower than that in the control; the 9 mm Hg-4 h, 12 mm Hg-4 h, 15 mm Hg-2 h CO2 groups at hours 24 and 36, and 15 mm Hg-4 H CO2 group at hours 24, 36, 48 and 60 hours showed significantly different D(490) values compared to the control ( all P 〈 0.05 ). CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure had transient effect on the proliferation of the SW480 ceils at hours 24 and 36 (P 〈 0.01 ), but showed no influence at hours 12, 48, 60, and 72 ( P 〉 0.05 ). All the experiment groups, except for group 9 mm Hg-1 h ( P 〉 0.05 ), showed significantly higher pH values at hours 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 ( all P 〈 0.05 ) compared with control groap. Conclusions Simulated CO2 pneumoperitoneum does not promote the growth of colonic cancer SW480 cells. The insufflation pressure restrains the growth of colonic cancer SW480 cells for a short period, but the duration of CO2 pneumoperitoneum does not affect the growth of colonic cancer SW480 cells.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2011年第7期644-648,共5页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
基金 温州市科技计划项目(Y20080238)
关键词 CO2气腹 结肠癌 增殖 细胞周期 PH值 CO2 pneumoperitoneum Colonic cancer Proliferation Cell cycle pH value
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1郑民华,马君俊,冯波,张轶,李健文,陆爱国,王明亮,胡艳艳,张俊,刘炳亚,李宏为.流式细胞术检测CO_2气腹对结肠癌细胞表面黏附分子的影响[J].外科理论与实践,2004,9(6):487-491. 被引量:15
  • 2余佩武,王自强,钱锋,罗华星,唐波,刘斌.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术105例[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(19):1303-1306. 被引量:161
  • 3Alexander R J, Jaques BC, Mitchell KG. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and wound recurrence. Lancet, 1993, 341:249-250.
  • 4Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopicassisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon. Report of a case.Dis Colon Rectum, 1993, 36:858-861.
  • 5Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350: 2050-2059.
  • 6Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002, 359: 2224-2229.
  • 7Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17: 903-910.
  • 8Korolija D, Tadic S, Simic D. Extent of oncological resection in laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery: meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2003, 387:366-371.
  • 9Lecuru F, Agostini A, Camatte S, et al. Impact of pneumoperitoneum on tumor growth. Surg Endosc, 2002,16:1170-1174.
  • 10Ishida H, Hashimoto D, Nakada H, et al. Increased insufflation pressure enhances the development of liver metastasis in a mouse laparoscopy model: possible mechanisms. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16: 331-335.

共引文献33

同被引文献16

  • 1Xu Kang,Fang Wang,Jin-Dong Xie,Jun Cao,Pei-Zhong Xian.Clinical evaluation of serum concentrationsof intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in patients with colorectal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(27):4250-4253. 被引量:9
  • 2Nason Gj ,Barry BD,Rajaretnam NS,et al. Long-term follow up for co- lon cancer in a minimally invasive, colorectal unit [ J]. Ir Med, 2013,106 (7) :204 - 207.
  • 3Andersson J,Angenete E,Gellerstedt M,et al. Health-related quali- ty of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial [ J ]. Brit J Surg,2013,100 : 941 - 949.
  • 4Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, et al. Laparoseopic vs open resec- tion for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials [ J ]. Colorectal Dis,2012,14 ( 6 ) : e277 - 296.
  • 5Sun J, Jiang T, Qiu Z, et al. Short-term and medium-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer: a single center retrospective case-control study[ J]. BMC Gastroenterol,2011,11:85.
  • 6Jayne DG,Thorpe HC,Copeland J,et al. Five-year follow-up of Med- ical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[ J]. Br J Surg,2010,97 (11) :1638 - 1645.
  • 7Janson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B, et al. Randomized trial of health-related quality of life after open and laparoseopic surgery for colon cancer[ J]. Surg Endosc ,2007,21 ( 5 ) :747 - 753.
  • 8Biondi A, Grosso G, Mistretta A, et al. Laparoscopic vs open ap- proach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery[J]. BMC Surg,2013,13(Suppl2):S12.
  • 9范莹,吴硕东,于宏,苏洋,孔静,田雨.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术与同期开腹手术对比的单中心回顾性研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2009,16(5):384-388. 被引量:77
  • 10鞠立霞,周彩存,李伟,严令华,唐亮.整合素β1表达上调对肺癌细胞迁移和粘附能力的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2009,9(20):3807-3810. 被引量:4

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部