期刊文献+

Cage椎弓根内固定联合自体颗粒骨打压植骨的即时生物力学稳定性 被引量:4

Clinical application of pedicle screw fixation with autogenous morselized bone graft impaction in senile lumbar degeneration:A study of immediate biomechanical stability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:自体骨移植结合椎间融合器联合椎弓根螺钉常运用于椎体融合,但单纯颗粒骨打压联合椎弓根钉的临床生物力学研究报道不多。目的:比较后路自体颗粒骨打压植骨内固定及Cage内固定的即时生物力学稳定性。方法:利用腰椎后路附件逐级破坏和椎间盘切除制作腰椎不稳模型。12具猪腰椎标本随机分为两组:打压植骨结合椎弓根螺钉内固定组(实验组),Cage结合椎弓根螺钉内固定组(对照组)。使用脊柱三维运动测试机模拟人体对两组标本在正常、不稳、融合3个状态下进行前屈、后伸、左右侧屈、左右旋转等各个活动的生物力学测试,三维激光扫描仪测定不同载荷下不稳节段的运动范围。结果与结论:正常状态下,两组间L2~3节段各方向运动范围差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),说明两组标本均衡性好,具有可比性;与正常状态相比,两组不稳状态各方向运动范围亦明显增加(P<0.05);融合后对照组L2~3节段椎间各方向运动范围均较实验组小,但差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。说明自体颗粒骨打压植骨内固定与Cage内固定均能明显提高脊柱的即时生物力学稳定性,而且两组对于改善脊柱稳定性无显著性差异。 BACKGROUND:Autogenous bone graft combined with cage has been widely used in lumbar interbody fusion by the use of vertebral pedicle screw fixation.But there is still lack of reports about autogenous morselized bone graft impaction with vertebral pedicle screw fixation concerning the clinical application and biomechanical research.OBJECTIVE:To evaluate and compare the biomechanical stability properties of autogenous morselized bone graft impaction with vertebral pedicle screw fixation,cage with vertebral pedicle screw fixation,so as to provide theoretical basis and experiment guidance in clinical use of autogenous morselized bone graft impaction with vertebral pedicle screw fixation in PLIF.METHODS:Resin embedding method and graded facetectomy and discectomy were made to prepare spinal instability models.Experimental group used autogenous morselized bone graft impaction with vertebral pedicle screw fixation;control group used cage with vertebral pedicle screw fixation.The three-dimensional motion of specimens was tested in intacted state,instability state and fusion state,which the flexion,extension,bilateral bending and axial rotation loading were applied to the specimens and the range of motion(ROM) were determined by the three-dimensional laser scanner.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no significant difference in all stability indexes(ROM) between two groups in intact state(P 0.05).Compared with the intact state,there was significant difference in all stability indexes in instable state between the two groups.After posterior lumbar interbody fusion,there was no significant difference in all stability indexes between two groups(P 0.05).Both the autogenous morselized bone graft impaction with vertebral pedicle screw fixation and cage with vertebral pedicle screw fixation can improve the immediate biomechanical stability of the spine,and there is no statistical difference in spinal stability capacity between two groups.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第26期4825-4828,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Yan DL, Pei FX, Li J, et al. Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(10):1311-1316.
  • 2Stonecipher T, Wright S. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with facet-screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14(4):468-471.
  • 3Boden SD. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(16 Suppl 1 ):S26-S31.
  • 4Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Hutton WC, et al. 1995 Volvo Award in basic sciences. The use of an osteoinductive growth factor for lumbar spinal fusion. Part I: Biology of spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(24):2626-2632.
  • 5Lawrence JP, Waked W, Gillon T J, et al. rhBMP-2 (ACS and CRM formulations) overcomes pseudarthrosis in a New Zealand white rabbit posterolateral fusion model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(11):1206-1213.
  • 6Hollowell JP, Vollmer DG, Wilson CR, et al. Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(9):1032-1036.
  • 7Hoshijima K, Nightingale RW, Yu JR, et al. Strength and stability of posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Comparison of titanium fiber mesh implant and tricortical bone graft. Spine. 1997;22(11 ): 1181-1188.
  • 8Arai Y, Takahashi M, Kurosawa H, et al. Comparative study of iliac bone graft and carbon cage with local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong). 2002;10(1 ): 1-7.
  • 9Lin PM Posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique: complications and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(193): 90-102.
  • 10海涌,陈晓明,陈志明,邹德威,马华松,邵水霖,周雪峰.后路椎间融合术治疗成人腰椎滑脱的前瞻性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(10):586-589. 被引量:66

二级参考文献64

共引文献144

同被引文献24

  • 1张光铂.再谈腰椎间盘突出症诊治中存在的问题[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(6):325-326. 被引量:19
  • 2卢永辉,董伟强,白波.老年人多节段腰椎管狭窄症应用椎弓根钉系统治疗的特点[J].中国老年学杂志,2004,24(9):824-825. 被引量:5
  • 3王达义,温国宏,李梅.腰椎管狭窄症的诊断、定位及手术要点[J].颈腰痛杂志,2005,26(4):288-290. 被引量:6
  • 4汤立新,宋应超,付鹏军,蒋洪涛,张朝远,胡殿绪,欧阳晟.后路减压复位椎间打压植骨内固定联合棘突椎板重建治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(4):279-279. 被引量:6
  • 5胥少汀,葛宝丰.实用骨科学[M].2版.北京:人民军医出版社,2003:1609-1670
  • 6Suk SI,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al.Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1997,22(2):210-219.
  • 7Kim SM,Lim TJ,Paterno J,et al.Biomechanical comparison:stability of lateral-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral fixation compared with anterior-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation in the lower lumbar spine[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2005,2(1):62-68.
  • 8Untch C,Liu Q,Hart R.Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion:the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2004,29(21):2376-2381.
  • 9Gillet P.The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2003,16(4):338-345.
  • 10Matsudaira K,Yamazaki T,Seichi A,et al.Spinal stenosis in grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a comparative study of outcomes following laminoplasty and laminectomy with instrumented spinal fusion[J].J Orthop Sci,2005,10(3):270-276.

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部