期刊文献+

Evi1基因特异性siRNA对HEL细胞生长周期的影响

Effect of specific siRNA of Evi1 gene on the growth cycle of HEL cells
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究Evi1基因特异性小干扰RNA(siRNA)对人红白细胞白血病(HEL)细胞增殖及生长周期的影响。方法将HEL细胞分为三组:Evi1基因siRNA组(A组)、siRNA-co对照组(B组)、细胞空白对照组(C组)。转染48 h后,台盼蓝染色实验检测细胞活力,流式细胞术检测细胞周期和凋亡率。结果与B、C组相比,A组HEL细胞活性下降[(97.13±1.58)%、(99.20±2.27)%vs.(26.05±2.49)%],细胞周期阻滞在G0/G1期[(39.61±1.32)%、(35.77±1.31)%vs.(79.07±1.43)%],S期细胞减少[(57.74±1.08)%(、57.36±1.38)%vs.(9.51±0.75)%],凋亡率增高[(9.78±1.14)%(、8.67±1.89)%vs.(49.94±1.75)%](P均<0.05);而B组和C组间各观察指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 Evi1基因特异性siRNA可抑制HEL细胞增殖,促进细胞凋亡。 Objective To investigate the effect of specific small interfering RNA(siRNA) of Evi1 gene on the proliferation and growth cycle of human erythroleukemia(HEL) cells.Methods The HEL cells were devided into three groups of A(transfected with Evi1 siRNA),B(transfected with siRNA-co) and C(blank controls).At 48 h after the transfection,cell activity was detected by trypan blue dye test,and cell cycle and rate of cell apoptosis were analyzed by flow cytometry.ResultsCompared with groups of B and C,cell activity was decreased [(97.13±1.58)%,(99.20±2.27)% vs.(26.05±2.49)%],cell cycle was blocked in G0/G1 phase [(39.61±1.32)%,(35.77±1.31)% vs.(79.07±1.43)%],cell population was reduced in S phase [(57.74±1.08)%,(57.36±1.38)% vs.(9.51±0.75)%],and rate of cell apoptosis was increased in group A [(9.78±1.14)%,(8.67±1.89)% vs.(49.94±1.75)%](P0.05).However,there was no significant difference of each index above between group B and group C(P0.05).Conclusion Evi1 siRNA can inhibit HEL cell proliferation and promote cell apoptosis.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第14期1620-1622,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30370606)
关键词 小干扰RNA Evil基因 人红白细胞白血病细胞 Small interfering RNA Evi1 gene Human erythroleukemia cells
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Konrad TA, Karger A, Hackl H, et al. Inducible expression of Evil in human myeloid cells causes phenotypes consistent with its role in myelodysplastic syndromes[J]. J Leukoc Biol, 2009, 86(4) :813-822.
  • 2Laricchia-Robbio L, Premanand K, Rinaldi CR, et al. Evil impairs myelopoiesis by deregulation of PU. 1 function [J]. Cancer Res,2009,69 (4):1633-1642.
  • 3Senyuk V, Sinha KK, Li D, et al. Repression of RUNXl activity by Evil: a new role of Evil in leukemogenesis [J]. Cancer Res,2007,67(12):5658-5666.
  • 4Lugthart S, van Drunen E, van Norden Y, et al. High Evil levels predict adverse outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: prevalence of Evil overexpression and chromosome 3q26 abnormalities underestimated[J]. Blood, 2008, 111 (8) : 4329- 4337.
  • 5Lu ZJ, Mathews DH. Efficient siRNA selection using hybrid ization thermodynamics [J ]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008, 36 (2): 640-647.
  • 6Chiu YL, Rana TM. siRNA function in RNAi:a chemical modi- fication analysis[J]. RNA,2003,9(9) : 1034-1048.
  • 7Chi Y, Senyuk V, Chakraborty S, et al. Evil promotes cell proliferation by interacting with BRG1 and blocking the repression of BRG1 on E2F1 activity[J]. J Biol Chem, 2003, 278(50) :49806-49811.
  • 8Kurokawa M, Mitani K, Yamagata T. The Evil oncopro tein inhibits c-Jun N-terminal kinase and prevents stress induced cell death[J]. EMBO J,2000,19(12):2958-2968.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部