期刊文献+

不同类型人工晶状体对白内障术后对比敏感度的影响 被引量:2

Study of contrast sensitivity function in postoperative intraocular lens implantation patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究不同类型人工晶状体植入术后暗视和明视下对比敏感度(contrast sensitivity,CS)的变化,评估患者术后的视觉质量。方法:采用对照研究的方法:实验组为2010-03/10期间于我院行超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术的老年性白内障患者50例55眼。全部患者分为3组,分别植入Sensar AR40e人工晶状体17眼,Bausch&Lomb LI61SE人工晶状体18眼和Array SA40N多焦点人工晶状体20眼,对照组为年龄相匹配的志愿者12例24眼。SensarAR40e人工晶状体的光学材料为疏水性丙烯酸酯,另外2种人工晶状体的光学材料为硅凝胶。检查患者术后和志愿者的最佳矫正视力后暗视和明视下对比敏感度。结果:Array SA40N组的CS除明视下0.8cpd以外在各空间频率较正常对照组均明显下降;Bausch&Lomb LI61SE组的CS在除0.8cpd以外其余各空间频率较正常对照组均明显下降;Sensar AR40e组在0.8cpd,1.5cpd的CS与正常对照组无明显差异,在其余各空间频率较正常对照组均明显下降。Array SA40N组在12cpd,20cpd的CS较其他两组人工晶状体眼下降。Sensar AR40e组和Bausch&LombLI61SE组各空间频率的CS相比较均无明显差异。结论:人工晶状体眼的CS较同龄正常对照组均明显下降;多焦点人工晶状体眼较单焦点人工晶状体眼的CS在高频区明显下降;疏水性丙烯酸酯与硅凝胶两种材料的人工晶状体对白内障术后CS的影响无明显差异。 AIM: To observe contrast sensitivity (CS)function recovery in postoperative senile cataract patients and to discuss the influencing factors of recovering visual quality. METHODS: Controlling investigative method was applied. Experimental group: 54 cases (55 eyes) were operated with Phaco + Sensar AR40e (17 eyes), Phaco + Bausch&Lomb LI61SE(18 eyes)or Phaco + Array SA40N (20 eyes) lens implantation. The optical materials of Sensar AR40e intraocular lens was hydrophobic acrylate, those of the other 2 types of intraocular lens were intraocular silicone. Controlling group: 12 cases (24 eyes) were aged matching volunteers, eliminating ophthalmology and other body diseases. The patients and the volunteer were examined their contrast sensitivity under the best-corrected visual acuity in dark and bright conditions. RESULTS: The CS of Array SA40N group was lower than the normal control group in any other spatial frequencies excluding 0.8cpd in bright conditions. The CS of Bausch&Lomb LI61SE group was lower than the normal control group in any other spatial frequency excluding 0.8cpd. The CS of Sensar AR40e group was lower than the normal control group in any other spatial frequencies excluding 0. 8cpd and 1. 5cpd. The CS of Array SA40N group was lower than the other two intraocular lens groups excluding 12cpd and 20cpd. There were no significant differences in all spatial frequencies between the CS of Sensar AR40e group and Bausch&Lomb Lt61SE group. CONCLUSION.. The CS of intraocular lens was significantly lower than that of the aged matching normal control group; the CS of the multifocal intraocular lens was significantly lower than that of the monofocal intraocular lens in the high frequency area; there were no significant differences between the CS of hydrophobic acrylic lens and silicone intraocular lens.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2011年第8期1340-1343,共4页 International Eye Science
关键词 人工晶状体 白内障 对比敏感度 intraocular lens cataract contrast sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1鲍连云,何伟,刘文辉,徐茂生.屈光性弱视与屈光参差性弱视对比敏感度变化的比较[J].眼科研究,2001,19(2):147-149. 被引量:27
  • 2Ulrich M , Patrick D , Nicola A. Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: Clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003 ;2(9) :652-660.
  • 3Kazuno N, Kazuhiko O, Norio H, et al . Effect of chromatic aberration on contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;11 (9) :1154-1158.
  • 4Antonio G, Manul 1 , Edward G, et al . Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofoeal intraocular lenseswere implanted. Arch Ophthalmol 2002 ; 120 ( 5 ) : 1143-1151.
  • 5Chalita MR , Krueger RR. Correlation of aberrations with visual acuity and symptoms. Ophtbalmol Clin North Am 2004 ; 17 ( 2 ) : 135-142.
  • 6Jampol LM, Kraft C, Sanders DR, et al . Near-UV radiation from the operating microscope andpseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;10(3) :28-30.
  • 7Werner JS, Hardenbergh FE. Spectral sensitivity of the pseudophakic eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1983 ; 101 ( 9 ) :758-760.
  • 8Marshall J, Cionni RJ, Davison J, et al . Clinical results of the blue- light filtering AcrySof Natural foldable acrylic intraocular lens.J Cataract Refract Surg 2005 ;31 (12) :2319-2323.
  • 9Leibovitch I, Lai T, Porter N, et al. Visual outcomes with the yellow intraoeular lens. Aeta Ophthalmol Seand 2006 ; 84 ( 1 ) :95-99.
  • 10Yuan Z, Reinach P, Yuan J. Constract ensitivity and color vision with a yellow intraocular lens. AM J OphtbMmol 2004 ; 13 ( 8 ) : 135-140.

二级参考文献7

  • 1李凤鸣.眼科全书(第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.1932.
  • 2Moseley M J, Fielder AR,Irwin M,etal. Effectiveness of occlusion therapy in ametriopic amblyopia:a pilot study. Br JOphthalmol, 1997,81:956
  • 3Simmers A J, Gray LS, McGraw PV, et al. Functional visual loss in amblyopia and theeffect of occlusion therapy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1999,40: 2859
  • 4Loeffler M,Wise JS, Gans M. Contrast. sensitivity letter charts as a test of visualfunction in amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus, 1990,27:28
  • 5Leguire LE, Rogers GL, Bremer DL. Amblyopia: the normal eye is not normal. JPediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 1990,27: 32
  • 6丁传庆,孙葆忱,郑远远,崔彤彤.常见致盲眼病的对比敏感度及滤光镜对视觉的影响[J].中华眼科杂志,1997,33(4):286-288. 被引量:4
  • 7庞利民,刘炯,赵娟,张晓光,刘克非,王桂云,于澎,拱中华,张晓猛.微机视觉对比敏感度检查仪的研制[J].眼科研究,1999,17(4):312-318. 被引量:3

共引文献26

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部