不作为侵权责任比较研究

A Comparative Study of Omission Tort liability

我国侵权法主要预防和制裁的是行为人的"积极作为侵权",对行为人的"消极不作为侵权"并没有明确规定。这就导致了人民法院在审判实践中因侵权法没有明确规定而无法做出裁判的尴尬局面。通过对国外相关国家民法中不作为侵权责任的考察,在借鉴国外先进立法经验的基础上,我国的不作为侵权应当采取"一般条款+类型化"的立法模式。

The Tort Law is primarily to prevent and sanction perpetrator＇s ＂active tort＂,but it does not clearly define the perpetrator＇s ＂negative tort by omission＂.And thus lead to an awkward situation in which the People＇s Court can not rule in trial practice because the Tort Law is not specific.By studying the omission tort liability in relevant civil code of some foreign countries and based on the advanced legislative experience of foreign countries,this article proposed that the legislative model of the omission tort should be ＂general terms plus stereotype＂.