摘要
《刑法修正案(八)》第6条的用语特征能引发我们反思通说对累犯前提的界定。通过语义分析,《刑法》第65条的"但书"仅对后罪起限制作用。从实质层面分析,主观恶性、人身危险性都不是累犯的本质特征,累犯的本质在于行为人的自由刑钝感。因此,累犯前提条件的重心是受刑的经历,累犯并不关心前罪的罪责类型与主体年龄。作为过失犯罪或未成年人犯罪结果的刑罚执行,也可以作为累犯的前提。
The characteristic of presentation of Article 6 of Amendment Ⅷ to Criminal Code revokes rethinking the dominating theory as to the essence of prerequisite of recidivism.Syntax parsing results in the conclusion that the wording ＂however＂ in amended Article 65 of Criminal Law restricts only the latter crime.In the facet of substantial analyzing,neither ＂subjective evil＂ nor ＂danger of recommitting＂ can precisely reveal the essence of recidivism.Only ＂insensitivity for imprisonment＂ can identify recidivism.Therefore,the experience of receiving penalty is the decisive point of the prerequisite of recidivism.It is not important whether the imprisonment is based on an intentional or a negligent crime,a juvenile delinquency or an adult-committed crime.The experience of receiving penalty,hereby,because of negligent crime or juvenile delinquency,can also be taken as foundation for affirmation of recidivism.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第4期109-114,共6页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
累犯前提
累犯本质
自由刑钝感
《刑法修正案(八)》
prerequisite of recidivism
essence of recidivism
insensitivity for imprisonment
Amendment VIII to Criminal Code
