期刊文献+

胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的微创治疗 被引量:15

Minimally invasive treatment for gallbladder stones complicated with Cholelithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的微创与开腹手术的治疗效果。方法将120例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者随机分为两步微创组与传统开腹组。两步微创组54例患者第一步在十二指肠镜下行逆行胰胆管造影(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)和内镜下乳头括约肌切开术(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)取石,第二步于2~5d后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(1aparoscopic chole-cystectomy,LC);传统开腹组66例患者采取开腹胆道探查术(open common bile duct exploration,OCBDE)。比较两组患者的手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间,治疗费用及术后并发症的发生率。结果两步微创组在手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间均优于传统开腹组(P<0.05);两步微创组术后出现并发症4例,传统开腹组出现并发症9例,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组住院费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论两步微创治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石有疗效好、创伤小、住院时间短等优点,有取代传统剖腹手术的趋势。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of two-step minimally invasive treatment and traditional exploratory choledochotomy and T- tube drainage for cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated choledocholithiasis were enrolled in this study. Fifty four patients were treated with endoscopic retrograde with cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), and then laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) after 2 ~ 5 days ( two-step minimally invasive treatment group), while 66 patients were treated with open cholecystectomy and choledochotomy with T-tube drainage (conventional open surgery group). Operation time, blood loss, stone size, complication rate, hospital stay and cost were observed and analyzed. Results Compared with conventional open surgery group, operation time, blood loss and hospital stay in two-step minimally invasive treatment group were significantly decreased(P 0.05); 4 patients in minimally invasive treatment group had complications, while 9 patients had complications in conventional open surgery group, the difference was significant(P 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in medical cost(P 0.05). Conclusion Two-step minimally invasive treatment is effective and feasible in the treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis, with shorter operation time, shortet hospital stay, and less complications.
出处 《现代消化及介入诊疗》 2011年第3期149-151,共3页 Modern Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment in Gastroenterology
关键词 胆囊结石 胆总管结石 腹腔镜胆囊切除 内镜下乳头括约肌切开术 Gallbladder stone Common bile duct stone Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1林建华,李朝龙.微创三孔打结法腹腔镜胆囊切除术33例[J].广东医学,2002,23(2):171-172. 被引量:3
  • 2Saccomani G, Durante V, Magnolia MR, et al. Combined endoscop- ic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc, 2005,19:910-914.
  • 3Kalimi R, Cosgrove JM, Marini C, et al. Combined intraoperative laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholan- giopancreatography: lessons from 29 cases. Surg Endosc, 2000,14: 232-234.
  • 4毛煜侃.双镜联合治疗老年结石性胆管炎合并胆囊结石的临床研究[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2010,31(2):71-73. 被引量:2
  • 5李利义,蒋平,林建华,唐湘莲.EST联合LC治疗老年胆囊结石并胆总管结石[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2010,22(1):62-63. 被引量:21
  • 6Shiozawa S, Kim DH, Usui T, et al. Indication of endoscopic retro- grade cholangiography by noninvasive predictive factors of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2011,21:28- 32.
  • 7马博,郑建忠,杨旭,吴江,张世天.腹腔镜联合十二指肠镜治疗胆囊结石伴胆总管结石:附164例报告[J].中国普通外科杂志,2008,17(8):739-741. 被引量:16
  • 8de Vries A, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, et al. Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholan- giography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time in- terval matter?. Surg Endosc, 2005,19:996-1001.
  • 9Misra M, Schiff J, Rendon G, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect? Surg Endosc, 2005, 19:1266-1271.
  • 10Schreurs WH, Juttmann JR, Stuifbergen WN, et al. Management of common bile duct stones: selective endoscopic retrograde cholan- giography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc, 2002,16:1068-1072.

二级参考文献26

共引文献38

同被引文献105

引证文献15

二级引证文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部