期刊文献+

昆明小鼠状态焦虑动物模型明暗箱实验的结构维度分析 被引量:6

Light-dark box as a model of state anxiety in Kunming mice: three behavioral dimensions by factor analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨明暗箱实验(Light-DarkBox,LDB)作为昆明小鼠状态焦虑动物模型的结构维度及测量有效性。方法成年雄性昆明小鼠放入明暗箱,摄像系统记录5min的行为变化,实验间隔1周进行2次;采用因子分析进行分析评价,实验参数如下:暗区潜伏期(Latence)、明区停留时间百分率(Ltime%)、明区水平运动百分率(Lcross%)、明区垂直运动百分率(Lrear%)、穿梭次数(Transition)、总水平运动(Cross)、总垂直运动(Rear)和粪便粒数(FB)。结果Ltime%、Lcross%、Lrear%以及Transition、Cross、Rear初测重测组内相关性均较好;Transition、Rear、FB初测重测相关性亦较好。LDB所有参数初测重测均可提取出四个公因子:Ltime%、Lcross、Lrear对焦虑因子贡献大(Loading%:39.54%、35.40%),Transition、Cross对运动因子贡献大(Loading%:23.78%、19.66%),Rear对探索因子贡献大(Loading%:13.75%、22.60%),FB对情绪因子贡献大(Loading%:14.42%、13.02%),而Latence参数初测重测因子贡献不稳定。结论LDB作为昆明小鼠状态焦虑动物模型具有稳定的三维结构:焦虑因子维度、LDB活性因子维度(运动因子+探索因子)和情绪因子维度。 Objective To explore the behavioral dimensions and validity of the light-dark box (LDB), as an model of state anxiety in Kunming mice. Methods The behavior of adult, male, Kunming mice in LDB was recorded twice, for five minutes, with a one-week inter-trial interval. The following parameters were evaluated by factor analysis:latence for the first entry into the dark area (Latence) ;percentage of time exploring in the light area (Ltime%);percentage of squares crossing in the light area (Lcross%);percentage of rears in the light area ( Lrear% ) ; transitions between two areas (Transition) ; total number of squares crossing in the whole apparatus (Cross) ;total number of rears in the whole apparatus(Rear) ;and number of fecal boli(FB). Results There was a good intercorrelation both among Ltime%, Lcross%, Lrear%, and among Transition, Cross, Rear. A good correlation also was found between test and retest for Transition, Rear and FB. Ltime%, Lcross% and Lrear% had significant loadings on Anxiety factor ( Loading% : 39.54% , 35.40% ) ; Transition loaded on Locomotor factor ( Loading% :23. 78%, 19. 66% ), combined with Cross; Rear loaded on Exploration factor ( Loading% : 13. 75%, 22.60% ) ;and FB loaded on Emotionality factor( Loading% : 14.42% , 13.02% ) ;Latence was not stable. Conclusion Light-dark box, as an animal model of state anxiety in Kunming mice, comprised three behavioral dimensions :anxiety factor,LDB-activity factor(locomotor factor and exploration factor) and emotionality factor.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期627-629,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30930110,30973688)
关键词 明暗箱实验 昆明小鼠 行为 结构 维度 状态焦虑 因子分析 相关性 Light-dark box Kunming Mice Behavior Structure Dimension State anxiety Factor analysis Correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Crawley J, Goodwin FK. Preliminary report of a simple animal behav- ior model for the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines. Phannacol Bio- chem Behav, 1980,13 : 167-170.
  • 2Costall B, Jones B J, Kelly ME, et al. Exploration of mice in a black and white test box:Validation as a model of anxiety. Pharmacol Bio- chem Behav, 1989,32:777-785.
  • 3孙世光,乔明琦,张惠云.昆明小鼠状态焦虑动物模型明暗箱实验的重测信度及参数相关性[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2011,20(3):198-201. 被引量:8
  • 4Hascoet M,Bourin M,Dhonnchadha BA. The mouse light-dark para- digm: A review. Prog Neuropsychophmanacol Biol Psychiatry, 2001, 25:141-166.
  • 5Bourin M, Hascoet M. The mouse light/dark box test. Eur J Pharma- col ,2003,463:55-65.
  • 6Walsh RN ,Cummins RA. The open-field test:A critical review. Psy- ehol Bull, 1976,83:482-504.
  • 7Shimada T, Matsumoto K, Osanai M, et al. The modified light/dark transition test in mice : evaluation of classic and putative anxiolytic and anxiogenic drugs. Genet Pharmacol, 1995,26:205-210.
  • 8Imaizumi M, Suzuki T, Machida H,et al. A fully automated apparatus for a light/dark test measuring anxiolytic or anxiogenic effects of drugs in mice. Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakuriqaku Zasshi, 1994,14:83-91.
  • 9Griebel G,Perrauh G,Sanger DJ. CCk receptor antagonists in animal models of anxiety : comparison between exploration tests, conflict proce- dures and a model based on defensive behaviours. Behav Pharmacol, 1997,8:549-560.
  • 10Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis:An overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods ,2009,14:6-23.

二级参考文献13

  • 1孟昭兰.情绪心弹学.北京:北京大学出版社,2005:187—194.
  • 2Kalueff AV, Wheaton M, Murphy DL. What S wrong with my mouse model? Advances and strategies in animal modeling of anxiety and depression. Behav Brain Res,2007,179 : 1-18.
  • 3Costall B,Jones BJ, Kelly ME,et al. Exploration of mice in a black and white test box:Validation as a model of anxiety. Pharmaeol Bioehem Behav, 1989,32 : 777-785.
  • 4Hascoel M,Bourin M, Dhonnchadha BA. The mouse light-dark paradigm:A review. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry,2001, 25:141-166.
  • 5Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psycho1 Rep, 1966,19:3-11.
  • 6Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas, 1960,20:37-46.
  • 7Stigler SM. Francis gallons account of the invention of correlation. Statist Sei, 1989,4:73-79.
  • 8Shimada T, Matsumoto K, Osanai M, et al. The modified light/dark transition test in mice : Evaluation of classic and putative anxiolytic and anxiogenic drugs. Genet Pharmacol, 1995,26:205-210.
  • 9Griebel G,Perrauh G, Sanger DJ. Cck receptor antagonists in animal models of anxiety : Comparison between exploration tests, conflict procedures and a model based on defensive bebaviours. Bebav Pbarmacol, 1997,8:549-560.
  • 10Crawley JN,Skolnick P,Paul SM. Absence of intrinsic antagonist actions of benzodiazepine antagonists on an exploratory model of anxiety in the mouse. Neuropharmacol, 1984,23 : 531-537.

共引文献7

同被引文献122

  • 1黄继忠,王祖承.焦虑动物模型的实验方法和药理学评价[J].上海精神医学,2003,15(2):106-109. 被引量:13
  • 2Hall CS.Emotional behavior in the rat.I.Emotional behavior in the rat:defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality.J Comparative Psychol,1934,18:385-403.
  • 3Denenberg VH.Open-field behavior in the rat:What does it mean.?Ann N Y Acad Sci,1969,159:852-859.
  • 4Walsh RN,Cummins RA.The open-field test:a critical review.Psychol Bull,1976,83:482-504.
  • 5Archer J.Tests for emotionality in rats and mice:a review.Anim Behay,1973,21:205-235.
  • 6Prut L,Belzung C.The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors:a review.Eur J Pharmacol,2003,463:3-33.
  • 7Jackson DL,Gillaspy JA.Purc-Stephenson R.Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis:An overview and some recommendations.Psychol Methods,2009,14:6-23.
  • 8Kaiser H.The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educ Psychol Meas,1960,20:141-151.
  • 9Cattell RB.The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behay Res,1966,1:245-276.
  • 10Whimbey AE,Denenberg VH.Two independent behavioral dimensions in open-field performance.J Comp Physiol Psychol,1967,63:500-504.

引证文献6

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部