1Has R, Batukan C, Ermis H et al. Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction.Gynecol Obstet Invest.2002,53(1) : 16 - 21.
2E1 - Sherbiny MT,E1-Gharieb IH,Gewely HA.Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor:25 vs.50 microg dose regimen.Int J Gynaecol Obstet.2001,72(1):25-30
3Diro M,Adra A,Gilles JM et al.A double- blind randomized trial d two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor in duction. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999,8(3):114-118.
4Srisomboon J, Singchai S. A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms d intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction. J Med Assoc Thai. 1998,81(10) :779-783.
5Farah LA, Senchez- Ramos L, Rosa c et al.Randomized trial of the two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoproetol for labor induction.Am J Obetet Gynecol. 1997,177(2) :364-369.
6Wing D A, Rahall A. Misoprostol: an effective agent for ripening ang labor induction. Am J obstet. Gynecol, 1995,172(6) :1811.
7Margulies M, Perez GA, Voto IS.Misoprostol to induce laboure. Lancet, 1991, 339 : 64.
8Kelly A, Bennett,MD, Kimberly Butt et al .A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal adninistration of misoprostol for labor induction.Obstet Gynecol.1998,92(4pt1):481-486
9Fisher SA, Mackenzie VP, Davise GA. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double - bline randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gyaecol. 2001 Oct, 1985(4) :906 - 910.
10Sherry A,Danielian P, Templeton A. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term. British J. Obstet Gynecol,2001,108(3) :238 - 243.
