期刊文献+

可充气式气囊加压敷贴的研制及加压效果影响因素的病例对照研究 被引量:3

Design and application of inflatable pressure applicator on the treatment of femoral shaft fractures:case control study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较可充气式加压敷贴与传统加压包扎对外科手术伤口愈合的影响。方法:将2009年5月至2010年2月入院接受手术治疗的50例闭合性股骨干骨折患者分为两组,每组25例。其中A组为试验组:年龄38~60岁,平均(55.1±9.5)岁;男13例,女12例;车祸伤18例,高处坠落伤6例,意外跌伤1例;术后伤口采用气囊加压敷贴包扎。B组为对照组:年龄40~65岁,平均(56.5±9.2)岁;男15例,女10例;车祸伤13例,高处坠落伤6例,意外跌伤6例;采用传统环扎加压包扎。观察术后12h两组伤口引流量、患肢末梢血氧饱和度及患者满意率,以评价气囊式加压敷贴的加压及止血效果。结果:A组患者术后12h伤口引流量为(77.5±4.6)ml,低于同时间点B组术后伤口引流量(94.3±3.8)ml;术后12、24hA组患者末梢血氧饱和度分别为(98.3±1.1)%、(98.9±0.8)%,均高于B组(96.5±0.4)%及(97.0±0.3)%;术后患者满意率A组高于B组。结论:与环扎加压包扎比较,可充气式加压敷贴的加压止血效果无明显差异,但对患肢末梢血运的影响较小,且术后患者的不适感减轻。 Objective:To compare the influence on the postoperative wound healing between inflatable pressure applicator and traditional pressure dressing.Methods:From May 2009 to February 2010,50 patients with closed femoral shaft fractures were randomly divided into group A and group B,with 25 patients in each group.There were 13 males and 12 females in group A,ranging in age from 38 to 60 years,with an average of(55.1±9.5) years;of them,road accident was in 18 cases,fall from heigh was in 6 cases,accidental falling injury was in 1 case.There were 15 males and 10 females in group B,ranging in age from 40 to 65 years,with an average of(56.5±9.2) years;of them,road accident was in 13 cases,fall from heigh was in 6 cases,accidental falling injury was in 6 cases.There was no significant difference between two groups in clinical data.The postoperative wounds of group A were binded with dressing of inflatable pressure applicator;and of group B with traditional pressure dressing.Volume of drainage at 12 h after operation,saturation of blood oxygen at 12,24 h after operation,satisfactory rate of patients were compared between two groups.Results:Postoperative volume of drainage in group A was lower than that of group B,respectively was(77.5±4.6),(94.3±3.8) ml.Saturation of blood oxygen at 12,24 h after operation in A group was respectively(98.3±1.1)%,(98.9±0.8)%,and in group B was respectively(96.5±0.4)%,(97.0±0.3)%;there was significant difference between two groups at the same time.Satisfactory rate of patients in A group was better than that of group B.Conclusion:Inflatable pressure applicator can obviously pressurize and stop bleeding for postoperative wounds,but no affect on peripheral blood supply and can improve discomfort of patients.
出处 《中国骨伤》 CAS 2011年第7期582-584,共3页 China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
关键词 伤口愈合 气囊 压力 股骨 骨折 病例对照研究 Wound healing Air sacs Pressure Femur Fractures Case-control studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

共引文献13

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部