期刊文献+

在“非议”中成长的测谎理论与实践

Theory and Practice of Polygraph Growing in Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 测谎是科学技术发展的产物。测谎作为一种科学认识活动,它的质量可控并且具有极大实践价值。因而,无论在侦查破案还是司法审判中都得到了广泛的应用并发挥了不可替代的作用。现实中的"非议"非但没有阻碍测谎技术的发展,相反成为了测谎成长的推动力,为我国关于测谎诉讼制度的发展和完善提出了新的课题。 Polygraph is the product of development of science and technology. Polygraph as a scientific understanding activity, its quality can be controlled, what's more ,it has great practical value. So, it has been widely used and played an irreplaceable role in both criminal investigation and judicial trials. The reproach of polygraph can not hinder the development of polygraph technology. Instead, it has become the driving force for polygraph growth. It put forward the new subject for our country about polygraph litigation system development and perfection.
作者 田振林
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《犯罪研究》 2011年第3期67-73,共7页 Chinese Criminology Review
关键词 测谎理论与实践 非议 成长 polygraph theory and practice criticism development
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1See Frye v. United States,293F. 1013(D.C.Cir). 1923.
  • 2何家弘.测谎结论与证据的“有限采用规则”[J].中国法学,2002(2):140-151. 被引量:109
  • 3[日]田口守一.《刑事诉讼法》,刘迪等译,法律出版社2000年版,第239页.
  • 4《德国刑事诉讼法典》,李昌珂译,中国政法大学出版社1995年版,第62页.
  • 5《意大利刑事诉讼法典》,黄风译,中国政法大学出版社1994年版,第67页.
  • 6See Edward J.Imwinkelried,The Daubert decision on the admissibility of science evidence:The supereme cour-choose the right piece for all the evidentiary puzzles,9 St.John' s J.Legal Comment.5,22(1993).
  • 7张泽涛.美国测谎制度的发展过程对我国的启示[J].法商研究,2003,20(6):123-130. 被引量:22
  • 8澳大利亚.《The Queensland Police Union》, June, 1997.
  • 9许宏伟,赵可欣.试论犯罪心理测试技术的科学性与公正性[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2001,17(4):121-126. 被引量:5
  • 10谢鹏.《测谎技术应用于刑事侦查的若干理论问题》,《侦查论丛》(第4卷),中国人民公安大学出版社2003年版,第643页.

二级参考文献24

  • 1[美]乔恩·华尔兹.《刑事证据大全》.中国人民公安大学出版社1993年版,第315页.
  • 2See Frye v. United States,293 F. 1013(D. C. Cir. 1923).
  • 3See Paul C Giannelli,The Admissibility of novel scientific evidence:Frye v. United States,a half- century later, 80 Colum.L Rev(1980).
  • 4See Shauna Flenming Askim,United States v.Scheffer:An mxxnaly in the miltabyor a return to the per se ban of polygraph evidence,37 Hous. L Rev. 175(spring,2000).
  • 5See Edward J Imwinkelried,The Daubert decision on the admissibility of science evidence: The supreme cour-choose the right piece for all the evidentiary puzzles,9 St. John's J Legal Comment. 5,22(1993).
  • 6See John C Candam,Jr ,Military Rule of Evidence 707:A Bright line rule that needs to be dimmed, 140 MIL L REV.65,69(1993).
  • 7See United States v. Seheffer,523 U S 303(1998).
  • 8See Andrew R Stolfi,Why Illinois should abandon frye's general aeceptence standard for the admission of novel science evidence, 78 Off - Kent L Rev. 861 (2003).
  • 9See Michael D Morgan, Lying in the Heartland: Problems and Solutions Regarding Polygraph Evidence in Ohio Criminal Procedure,26 Ohio N U L Rev,89(2000).
  • 10See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc ,509 U S 579(1993).

共引文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部