期刊文献+

从司法审判实践角度完善我国的外国法查明制度 被引量:5

On Improving China's System of Ascertainment of Foreign Law in Light of Chinese Judicial Practices
下载PDF
导出
摘要 外国法的内容是否得以查明,是我国大陆地区法院在涉外民商事案件审理中是否能够正确适用外国法的前提。当法院受理案件之后,如果按照冲突规范的指引,在排除反致,公共秩序保留,法律规避等制度阻却的前提下,仍然确定应当适用某一外国法作为处理案件争议的准据法时,法院如何认定外国法的性质,又应采用何种途径查明该外国法,在查明外国法后在具体案件中应当如何正确适用等问题,都是我国涉外民事关系法律适用制度中的极为重要的问题。笔者通过对我国大陆地区一些法院涉外民商事案件审判工作的实地调研,运用实证研究的方法,对这些问题做出了分析与探讨,并指出应从有利于司法审判实践的角度对我国的外国法查明制度进行更为深入的完善。 The ascertainment of foreign law is the premise for the correct application of foreign laws in the jurisdiction over foreign-related civil and commercial cases by courts in the Chinese mainland.When the court accepts and hears a case,according to the guidelines on conflict rules,we shall concern ourselves with these questions: excluding provisions on renvoi,public order reservation,evasion of law,identification of the nature of foreign law,approaches to ascertaining foreign law,proper application of foreign law in specific cases after its being ascertained,etc.all of which function crucially in the jurisdiction over foreign-related civil and commercial cases by Chinese courts.The present author,based on a scrupulous survey of the judicial practices in regard to foreign-related civil and commercial cases heard by some courts in the Chinese mainland,and through empirical research,analyzes and discusses these issues mentioned above.It is maintained that the current system of ascertaining foreign law in China should be further strengthened from the perspective of improving the effectiveness of Chinese judicial practices.
作者 马擎宇
出处 《南阳师范学院学报》 CAS 2011年第7期8-13,共6页 Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词 外国法的性质 外国法的查明途径 外国法查明后的适用 nature of foreign law ascertainment approaches of foreign law application of foreign law after ascertainment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1郭玉军.论外国法的查明与适用[A].珞珈法学论坛(第六卷)[C].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007.
  • 2[加]泰特雷.国际冲突法:普通法、大陆法及海事法[M].刘兴莉译,黄进校,北京:法律出版社,2003.
  • 3宋晓.外国法:“事实”与“法律”之辨[J].环球法律评论,2010,32(1):14-21. 被引量:16
  • 4The Permanent Bureau otthe Hague Conterence on Private International Law,The Treatment of Foreign Law (Suc- cinct Analysis Document), Information Document of February 2007 for the attention of the meeting of experts of 23 and 24 February 2007 on the treatment of foreign law, Annex.
  • 5江苏省高级人民法院(2000)苏经初字第1号一审判决[Z].
  • 6谢军.上海一中院首创当庭上网查明外国法[N].光明日报,2006-01-15(6).
  • 7郑新俭,张磊.完善我国域外法查明制度之研究[J].人民司法,2005(6):70-75. 被引量:6
  • 8杨苏.涉外合同纠纷案件适用法院地法的实践及其完善[J].法治论丛(上海大学法学院上海市政法管理干部学院学报),2004,19(1):35-39. 被引量:11
  • 9詹思敏,侯向磊.域外法查明的若干基本问题探讨[A].中国涉外商事审判热点问题探析[C].北京:法律出版社,2004.
  • 10See Ulrich Drobing,The Use of Foreign Law by Ger- man Courts,in Erik Jayme (ed.),German National Reports in Civil Law Matters for the XIVth Congress of Comparative Law in Athens 1994,Heidelberg 1994.

二级参考文献17

  • 1李双元 金彭年著.《中国国际私法通论》(第二版)[M].法律出版社,2004年7月出版.第186页.
  • 2何易.“中国法院审理涉外民商案件法律适用实证分析”[J].中国涉外商事海事审判指导与研究,2001,.
  • 3Professor Paul R. Rice, Director,THE EVIDENCE PROJECT Proposed Revisions to the Federal Rules of Evidence,Edited by Thomas C. Goldstein, American University Washington College of Law.http ://www.wcl.american.edu/pub/journals/evidence/toc.html.
  • 4See Sofie, " Foreign law in civil litigation", at p6.
  • 5See Fentiman, "Foreign law in English Court", (2001), at p56.
  • 6詹思敏 侯向磊.“域外法查明的若干基本问题”[A]..《民商法理论与审判事务研究》[C].人民法院出版社,2003年版.第499页.
  • 7T.C.Hartley."Pleading and Proof of Foreign Law:The Major European Systems Compared"[].IClQ.1996
  • 8Dicey,Morris.The Conflict ofLaws[]..
  • 9T.C.Hartley."Pleading and Proof of Foreign Law:The Major European Systems Compared"[]..
  • 10Dicey,Morris.The Conflict ofLaws[]..2000

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部