期刊文献+

五年制高职英语分层次教学中的成绩评定

Performance Evaluation of English Hierarchical Teaching in Five-year Vocational College
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据五年制高职的总目标和要求,结合素质教育、因材施教、多元智能等多种理论,南京高等职业技术学校英语学科采用了分层次教学模式,新生入学后根据分层次考试成绩划分为A层(较高层次)、B层(普通层次)以及C层(较低层次),并且首次提出渐变式成绩评定办法,将学生的自主学习、团队合作、课堂表现等纳入考核范围,并充分考虑到各层次各年级学生的英语学习基础以及学习习惯等特点,打破了从低年级到高年级成绩评定办法一成不变的传统模式。 According to the overall objectives and requirements of five-year vocational college, combined with the theory of quality education, individualized, multiple intelligences and so on, in Nanjing Technical Vocational College, the English subject used hierarchical teaching mode to divide new students into A (high level), B (ordinary level) and C (lower level), and put forward tapered performance evaluation approach for the first time. The teachers bring the students' independent learning, teamwork, classroom performance, etc. into the examination and be fully taking English learning elements, study habits and other learning features of all students at all levels into account, which breaks static evaluation approach of the traditional model.
作者 姚煜华
出处 《科教导刊》 2011年第16期106-107,125,共3页 The Guide Of Science & Education
关键词 五年制高职 南京高等职业技术学校 分层次教学成绩评定方法 five-year vocational college nanjing technical vocational college hierarchical teaching performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]Willing, K. Learning strategies as information management [J]. Prospect: The Journal of the Adult Migrant Educational Program, 1987(2).
  • 2[2]Clifford, V. A. The development of autonomous learners in a university setting[J]. Higher Education Research & Development, 1999,18(1) :115-128.
  • 3[4]Little, D. Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy [J]. System, 1995, 23 (2): 175- 181.
  • 4[5]Littlewood, W. "Autonomy": An anatomy and a framework[J]. System, 1996,24(4) :427-435.
  • 5[6]Chan, V. Learning autonomously: The learners' perspectives[J].Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2001,25 (3): 285-300.
  • 6[7]Wenden, A. Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy [M]. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International, 1991.
  • 7[8]Boston, C. The concept of formative assessment[J]. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2002,8 (9).
  • 8[9]Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. Autonomy and motivation: Which comes first? [J]. Language Teaching Research, 2002,6 (3): 245-266.
  • 9[10]Black, P. & William, D. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment[J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 1998,80(2) :139-148.
  • 10[11]Angelo, T. A. & Cross, K. P. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd Edition)[M]. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993.

共引文献266

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部